Sandy,
 
I'd second anything that would move towards some (lots?) of clarification within the DC corporate setting.  Of your two choices DC.publisher.business vs DC.identifier.project, without having spent too much time on this, I'd go with the second choice or slightly change the first one (publisher and business are almost synonmys in this situation aren't they?).
 
Now regarding your proposal to get the list working on such a project.  Count me in, I'd suggest to wait a short while for the raise of hands and then start on it while keeping it open for any future "involvee".  In that regards we should start by defining the concept "application profile" a bit more precisely shouldn't we?
 
Looking forward to join on the virtual tour!
 
Igor Perisic
 
 



Igor Perisic, Ph.D.
Research Director
Address:
   Entopia Inc.
   1301 Shoreway Road, Suite 302
   Belmont, CA 94002, USA
   www.entopia.com
Contact:
   Tel: 1.650.232.1373
   Cell: 1.650.740.8209
   Fax: 1.650.802.6709
   [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Sandra F Hostetter [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Exploring interest in building a DC corporate "application profile"


Hello everyone,

In Mike Crandall's 2/17/2003 message he mentioned the topic of application profiles.  First, just to check my understanding, would an example of a "corporate" extension be something like DC.publisher.business unit or DC.identifier.project number?  Second, is there interest among other members of this list to actually work on such a project together?  I personally would be interested and would be willing to coordinate some virtual collaboration efforts (no traveling for me in this economy).

Sandy Hostetter
Rohm and Haas Company
1-215-61-5492
[log in to unmask]

the opinions expressed are my own and do not represent those of the Rohm and Haas Company