Print

Print


On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 10:41, Phil Barker wrote:
> 
> I think you mean "x-none"
> 

I'm afraid not. '"none" shall also be an acceptable value' (IEEE LOM,
page 11).

IIRC, the original proposal we made to IMS said x-none for full
compatibility with RFC3066, but LOM for some reason chose not to use
this.

/Mikael

> Phil.
> 
> --
> Phil Barker                            Learning Technology Advisor
>       ICBL, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
>       Mountbatten Building, Heriot-Watt University,
>       Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
>       Tel: 0131 451 3278    Fax: 0131 451 3327
>       Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
-- 
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose