Appologies to Lorna for not forwarding this earlier ... I didn't realise it hadn't got through to the list as she intended. Phil -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: UKCMF Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:27:58 -0500 From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: [log in to unmask] To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask] Hi Dave, Apologies for the delay in replying, I'm currently at a conference in Manchester and have just got access to my e-mail for the first time this week! I've glad you found the X4L/Jorum workshop useful. I know that Phil has already posted a copy of the UKCMF to the Metadata SIG home page and you can also find it on the Jorum+ website at http://www.jorum.ac.uk/support/metadata.html Regarding the status of the document I would advise all X4L projects to consider this application profile stable enough for implementation. While we are seeking feedback on the UKCMF, and would encourage all those with an interest in metadata to forward comments to either Gerry Graham ([log in to unmask]) or myself ([log in to unmask]), I would not envisage that our advice to the X4L projects will change radically over the duration of the programme. We will shortly be releasing a more general version of the UKCMF which will not include the specific advice for the X4L Programme. We may revise this general draft on the basis of feedback but we will attempt to minimise any changes to the X4L version. In terms of contentious issues the main one that has already arisen is the recommendation that X4L projects use Dewey as their basic subject classification scheme. (Remember that multiple classifications are allowed and other additional discipline specific sclassification schemes may also be used e.g MESH.) We are aware that Dewey is not ideal, however it is already widely used in UK educational contexts and there are few viable alternatives other than the learndirect Classification Scheme. Unfortunately developing a new generic subject classification scheme is way beyond the scope of the X4L Programme. So in order to be pragmatic about this we will stick with our recommendation to use the top two levels of Dewey for basic subject classification. If you require further clarification on these issues please feel free to contact me. I will be out of the office for the next two weeks but will hopefully have periodic access to my e-mail. (Phil I don't know if this mail will reach the Metadata SIG list as it'd coming form my unix address, if it bounces back could you resend it for me please? Thanks.) Bye Lorna Hi! Many thanks to everyone at the workshop yesterday in Manchester - it certainly helped clarify many of the things I'd been worrying about! The UKCMF sounds to be exactly what I'm after so it would be really handy to know what the possible time scales involved with the document will be, so that I can plan ahead with the remaining development on our project. When would you estimate that the document will move on from draft status, and would it be wise for me to begin implementing it whilst it was still in the draft stage? I'm guessing that some of the elements chosen might be more contentious (and possibly more likely to change during the debating phase) than others - would the draft document highlight these elements? Many thanks in advance :-) Dave Pattern -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . -- Phil Barker Learning Technology Advisor ICBL, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Mountbatten Building, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS Tel: 0131 451 3278 Fax: 0131 451 3327 Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/