JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2004

PODIATRY 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Grandparenting non state registered chiropodists and podiatrists in UK.

From:

Mark Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A group for the academic discussion of current issues in podiatry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 1 Sep 2004 13:53:10 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (70 lines)

Jacqui and Tony,

Your sentiments are understandable; the HPC has allowed parity without
ensuring competency and at the same time the independent ‘schools’ are
preparing to change the terminology of their correspondence courses so
their ‘graduates will use the terms, Foot Care Practitioners, Podologists,
Podiatric Specialists, Chiropodial Practitioners ….ad nauseum. What could
have been an opportunity to close the profession has degenerated into a
farce; diluting the professional base whilst leaving the back door wide
open to all.

You are quite right to be pissed off; just think how some of this year’s
graduates feel after completing 3-4 years study and incurring all the debt
along the way, only to find they needn’t have bothered. I am given to
understand that there is a twenty-one year-old beautician who has been
accepted onto the register by dint of having a portion of her income
derived from offering pedicures over the last three years. That’s got to be
the way to go in future – even Mike Batt’s crowd couldn’t compete with that
route for cost effectiveness!

What is more surprising is that the Premier Professional Body AKA the SCP
are also welcoming the unregistered with open arms. Even though their
Articles of Association specify that applicants from routes other than
accredited courses must first sit an exam set/approved by Council, non-
registered have been joining the Society in droves (well one or two anyway)
and been offered full membership with no differentiation between themselves
and existing members. In essence the SCP are endorsing the HPC’s mess!  Now
if that’s raised the BP a little sit down, take some deep breaths and
prepare for this one…….

Not only are the SCP holding the doors wide open….so are some podiatry
managers in the National Health. I have it on good authority that two
members of SCP’s council (who, strangely enough, happen to be NHS podiatry
managers) are openly advocating employment of the non-registered alongside
the degree/diploma practitioner. Makes you wonder why you spent the last 20
years telling patients to ensure ‘their chiropodist was state registered’
doesn’t it? Getting angry now? Face flushed with rage? Well then, just stop
for a moment and consider our colleagues in orthopaedics who this week
declared ‘open warfare’ on podiatry because of the territorial encroachment
by podiatric surgeons who undertake distance learning and weekend courses
and qualify as ‘consultant surgeons’ in a fraction of the time that it
takes through the medical route. How could we possibly criticise the HPC
when we would be seen to be taking a duplicitous stance vis-ŕ-vis our own
[sic] activities? Consider also that the Council of the SCP is made up
predominately with Podiatric Surgeons and NHS managers and you might just,
through that boiling rage, begin to understand why we are in the mess we
are!

Jacqui – if you ever have a patient who said he was guidance and careers
master at Beath High School during the years 1973-1979 – stick an E11 in as
far as it goes please.

Yours despondently

Mark Russell

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager