Gregor,
On second reflexion this is "all" mumbo-jumbo to me.
Henry
Gregor Wolbring wrote:
> Still Henry,
> every group has a different angle. the sanctity of life is not a
> disability related concept. As i said disabled people can believe in
> sanctity of life but that has nothing to do with their disability.
> the same that women aboriginals can do so but again it is not related to
> being a women or being an aboriginal. But their are specific arguments
> related to marginalized groups which others can't use.
> Cheers
> Gregor
>
> On Fri,
> 3 Sep 1999, Henry Cullihall wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > indeed the demise of the sanctity of life ethics is not the angle to be
> > used by disability groups. >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > Gregor,
> > A comment:
> > I belong to several "disability groups" The sanctity of life "angle" is what I
> > believe in. Also Disability Groups memberships maybe about 2%
> > of a given Disability Population. For example where I live Winnipeg, there may
> > be 60,000 P/w/d. But about 1000 may relate to or
> > be involved in Disability Groups. Said another way Disability, Womens,
> > aboriginal most minority groups to not "speak for" but claim to speak for a
> > given minority population.
> > Cheers
> > Henry
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Dr. Gregor Wolbring
> Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
> Faculty of Medicine
> University of Calgary
> 3330 Hospital Drive NW
> Calgary, T2N 4N1
> Alberta, Canada
> Phone 1403-220-5448
> Fax 1-403-283-4740
> eFax 1-603-761-3704
> e-mail [log in to unmask]
> webpage: http://www.thalidomide.ca/gwolbring
>
> Dr. Gregor Wolbring
> Adjunct Assistant Professor
> Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies
> University of Calgary
> Phone 1403-220-5448
> Fax 1-403-283-4740
> eFax 1-603-761-3704
> e-mail [log in to unmask]
> webpage: http://www.thalidomide.ca/gwolbring
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|