It would be interesting, scholarly and useful (a preparation perhaps for
any forthcoming debate between Peter Singer and "Social Model theorists" as
Judy suggests) if any critics of Stephen Drake's "Singer Fact Sheet" posted
a detailed critique of it on this list.
Erik Leipoldt
At 18:38 30/08/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, John Homan wrote:
>
>> I am on Judy (not related) side
>
>Clear, and to the point.
>
>In your last post to the list, you were unable to evaluate whether I'd
>characterized Singer's writings accurately. That was fair. It appeared,
>however, that you hadn't read the material at that time.
>
>Now, though, you're agreeing that I've mischaracterized his position, on
>the basis of Judy's as yet unsupported claim. You're also agreeing that
>the many disability groups around the world who've opposed Singer's
>viewpoint have mischaracterized his work, and that they've done so for
>less than honorable reasons.
>
>So I'm wondering:
>
>Have you read Singer's work? Can you explain clearly why disability
>activists around the world are wrong in their understanding? Thus far,
>the criticisms of these activists have mostly been ad hominem attacks; if
>so many of us are wrong, there must be a way to explain that.
>
>If you haven't, why not? You clearly think it's an important enough issue
>to take a stand on, and I agree with you. Isn't it also important enough
>to understand before taking a "side"?
>
>Stephen Drake
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|