Kate - bloody hell, and they think we are nuts?
When will the discussion commence, or this as far as it ever gets?
Peter French BEd MAcc MEd
University of New England -
http://www.une.edu.au
Member Australian College of Education
http://www.austcolled.com.au
[log in to unmask]
Doctor of Education Candidate
Graduate School of Education
Latrobe University -
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/www/gse/
Bundoora, Australia
-----Original Message-----
From: Kate Stewart <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: discussion - attachments - duplication
>At 09:32 20/04/99 -0500, you wrote:
>><MyRant>
>>TEXT DOCUMENTS TEND TO BE MUCH SHORTER THAN THEIR NATIVE FORMAT
>>BRETHREN.
>>Now all the bandwidth generated by these rants could have been avoided
>>either by distribution of the text document in the first place, rather
>>or by posting it to an ftp or http site and publising the URL.
>>Isn't all of this obvious yet?
>
>As someone who simply 'drives' my pc and email (self taught in haste and
>necessity), I have to say it wasn't obvious, and is still mysterious,
>though I'm grateful for what I've learned from this and other recent
>'rants' about attachments. Oh you who are wise in the ways of qualitative
>data analysis AND software have mercy upon us poor sinners who are trying
>to learn - a sistren
>
>
>Kate Stewart
>Doctoral Student
>Division of Psychology - School of Life Sciences
>Australian National University
>Canberra A.C.T. 0200 AUSTRALIA
>(02) 6249 3972
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|