JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT Archives


CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT Archives

CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT Archives


CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT Home

CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT Home

CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT  April 1999

CRITICAL-MANAGEMENT April 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Responsible Journalism and Biased Communication

From:

Michael CHUMER <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Michael CHUMER <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 8 Apr 1999 07:58:49 -0400 (EDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (229 lines)

Though not really areas (journalism and communication) in the mainstream of
management. The following demonstrates the need for a "critical approach".

Mike Chumer

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 11:52:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael CHUMER <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Responsible journalism and biased communication

Hi...

The communication  that I am sending to the list was sent to me by one of my
USNA classmates as a "think" piece. Since as part of the military we were
enmeshed in the Vietnam conflict having spent tours there, I find that there
are indeed lessons tucked into the communication that we as researchers,
communication scholars, and perhaps future journalists should be atuned to.
Due dillgence is at the heart of the communication and should be expected of
journalists and communicators by the public. The press is not immune to
developing a collective consciousness based on shoddy research
proceedures, filtered through a stereotypical investigative lens.

You may draw your own conclusions.

Mike Chumer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Voice in the Wilderness
 
Every once in a while, a real "think-piece" appears and should be shared
with the fraternity.
 
Challenging assumptions
 
NBC's "The Sixties": Slandering an Entire Generation of Warriors By Mackubin
Thomas Owens
 
There is plenty to criticize in the recent NBC mini-series "The Sixties."
But for my money, the worst aspect of this dreadful
contribution to the popular culture is the fact that it slanders an entire
generation of fighting men: those who put their lives on the line in
Vietnam.
 
There is an undeniable orthodoxy associated with the Vietnam veteran.
According to the conventional wisdom, those who served in Vietnam were
largely young and poor. Minorities were disproportionately represented.
They suffered unspeakable trauma. Many, if not most, committed or  observed
atrocities. The horrors of the war led many to turn to drugs
and a life of crime. As many as half of those who served in Vietnam  suffer
from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). More Vietnam veterans have
committed suicide than died in the war. Vietnam veterans are
disproportionately represented among the homeless and the incarcerated. The
Vietnam veteran was and is a time bomb waiting to go off. Brian, the
brother in the mini-series who goes to Vietnam reflects this orthodoxy,
returning as the burnt-out, drug-addicted, Traumatized Vet.
Will Rogers once said that "it's not the things we don't know that get us
into trouble. It's the things we know that just ain't so." This applies in
spades to Vietnam veterans. The fact is, most of what people "know" about
them"just ain't so."
 
For instance, the war was not fought primarily by reluctant draftees,
predominantly composed of the poor, the young, or racial minorities. The
poor and the minorities fought and died in Vietnam, but so did the middle
class. The record indicates that 86 % of those who died during the war were
white and 12.5 % were black, from an age group in which blacks comprised
13.1% of the population. Two thirds of those who served in Vietnam were
volunteers, and volunteers accounted for 77 % of combat deaths.
 
Statistics indicate that the suicide, homelessness, and drug abuse rates of
Vietnam veterans are no higher than for non-vets and non-theater Vietnam era
veterans. The incarceration rate is lower. And while PTSD is a real
phenomenon, it is not nearly as widespread as the press portrays it. The
press regularly claims that PTSD continues to affect 500,000 to 1.5 million
Vietnam veterans, i.e. nearly one-sixth (18 %) to nearly one-half of the 3.3
million men who served in theater. These numbers, derived from the flawed
National Vietnam Veteran Readjustment Study, are implausibly high,
especially given that fewer than 15 percent of those who served in country
were assigned to combat units.
 
A much better designed study by the Centers for Disease Control reported
that 15% of Vietnam veterans experienced some symptoms of combat-related
PTSD at some time during or after military service, but that only 2.2 %
exhibited symptoms at the time of the study.
 
But most tellingly, a comprehensive 1980 survey commissioned by Veterans'
Administration (VA) reported that 91 % of those who had seen combat in
Vietnam were "glad they had served their country;" 80 % disagreed with the
statement that "the US took advantage of me;" and nearly two out of three
would go to Vietnam again, even knowing how the war would end.
 
For years, many of us who served in Vietnam tried to make the case reflected
in these figures: that the popular image of the Vietnam vet as maladjusted
loser, dehumanized killer, or ticking "time bomb" was at odds with reality.
Indeed, it was our experience that those who had served in Vietnam generally
did so with honor, decency, and restraint; that despite often being viewed
with distrust or opprobrium at home, most had asked for nothing but to be
left alone to make the transition back to civilian life; and that most had
in fact made that transition if not always smoothly, at least successfully.
 
But the press could always find the stereotypical, traumatized vet who could
be counted on to tell the most harrowing and gruesome stories of combat in
Vietnam, often involving atrocities. Many of the war stories recounted by
these individuals were wildly implausible to any one who had been in
Vietnam, but credulous journalists, most of whom had no military experience,
uncritically passed their reports along to the public.
 
I always agreed with the observation of Harry Summers, a well-known military
commentator who served as an infantryman in Korean and Vietnam, that the
story teller's distance from the battle zone was directly proportional to
the gruesomeness of most atrocity stories. But until the publication of a
remarkable new book, Stolen Valor: How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of
Its Heroes and its History by B.G. Burkett and the fine Texas writer, Glenna
Whitley (Verity Press, www.stolenvalor.com) <http://www.stolenvalor.com) ,
neither Harry nor I any idea just how true his observation was.
 
Mr. Burkett is best known to those of us who live in New England as the man
who sent Joe Yandle back to prison. Yandle admitted to being the getaway
driver during a 1972 liquor store holdup in Medford, Massachusetts that
resulted in the murder of the store manager. Under Massachusetts law, even
though Yandle did not pull the trigger, he was equally complicit with the
gunman. Convicted of the crime and sentenced to life in prison without
parole, Yandle never claimed to be innocent, but contended that the hell of
the Vietnam war had driven him to drugs and crime.
 
The CBS news magazine 60 Minutes did a segment on Yandle in which Mike
Wallace told viewers that Yandle did two tours in Vietnam and "came home
with a Bronze Star for valor, two Purple Hearts and something else--a heroin
habit." The 60 Minutes report was instrumental in convincing then-Governor
William Weld to commute Yandle's life sentence to time served--23 years.
 
But Mr. Burkett discovered that although Yandle had indeed served in the
Marines and had been honorably discharged, he had never set foot in Vietnam.
He had manufactured the claim that he had survived the 77-day siege of Khe
Sanh. He certainly did not rate the Bronze Star and two Purple Hearts for
wounds received.
 
What is striking about the Yandle case is the predisposition on the part of
journalists uncritically to accept the claim that service in Vietnam was an
indicator of, even an explanation for, criminal activity at home. How could
hard-nosed, ace investigative reporter Mike Wallace and others like him be
so easily taken in? Mr. Burkett's answer to this question stands as a rebuke
to American journalism.
 
The fact is that the media has peddled the "Vietnam vet goes berserk" angle
for a very long time. A milestone of sorts was the 1988 CBS documentary "The
Wall Within" which constituted a veritable caricature of Vietnam veterans:
they routinely committed war crimes. They came home from an immoral war
traumatized, vilified, then pitied. Jobless, homeless, addicted, suicidal,
they remain afflicted by inner conflicts, stranded on the fringes of
society.
 
This image had its genesis in the anti-war left of the 1960s and 70s. The
war was uniquely brutal and unjust, went the argument, and brutalized those
who fought it. At first the anti-war left vilified veterans as war criminals
and baby-killers. But this approach evolved into the idea that the Vietnam
veteran was a victim: he was victimized first by his country, which made him
poor and then sent him off to fight an unjust war. Then he was victimized by
a military that dehumanized him and turned him into a killer. All the
Vietnam veteran had to do to receive the absolution of the anti-war left was
to confess his sins.
 
Mr. Burkett demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that most of those who
"confessed" were frauds. Nonetheless, the public confessions made for great
theater: Mark Lane's absurd Conversations With Americans, Paul Solotaroff's
equally disreputable The House of Purple Hearts, the Vietnam Veterans
Against the War and the now-discredited "Winter Soldier" Investigation of
1970 all reinforced the image of the Vietnam veteran as victim.
 
At about the same time, anti-war psychiatrists such as Robert Jay Lifton
claimed that since Vietnam was worse than earlier wars, returning soldiers
would suffer severe psychological effects specific to the war. Mr. Lifton
was instrumental in the development of PTSD. Finally, to justify its budget
as the World War II veteran population declined, the VA came on board. (A
National Academy of Sciences study commissioned by the VA had reported that
25 % of the World War II vets suffered from emotional and psychological 
symptoms similar to those ascribed to PTSD.) Ideology and the self-interest
of bureaucrats constitute a powerful combination..
 
"The Sixties" illustrates that this image of the Vietnam vet prevails even
today. But is it true? Mr. Burkett shows that the answer is no. In the
course of trying to raise money for a Texas Vietnam Veterans Memorial, Mr.
Burkett discovered that reporters were only interested in homeless veterans
and drug abuse and that the corporate leaders he approached had bought into
the popular image of the Vietnam vet: not honorable men (and women) who took 
pride in their service, but whining welfare cases, belly-aching about what
an immoral government did to them.
 
Fed up, Mr. Burkett did something that any reporter worth his or her salt
could have done: he used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to check the
actual records of the "image makers" used by reporters to flesh out their
stories on homelessness, Agent Orange, suicide, drug abuse, criminality, or
alcoholism. What he found was astounding. More often than not, the show case
"veteran" who cried on camera about his dead buddies, about committing or
witnessing atrocities, or about some heroic action in combat that led him to
the current dead end in his life, was an impostor.
 
Indeed, Mr. Burkett discovered that over the last decade, some 1,700
individuals, including some of the most prominent examples of the Vietnam
veteran as dysfunctional loser, had fabricated their war stories. Many had
never even been in the service. Many, like Joe Yandle, had been, but had
never but had never  been in Vietnam.
 
Stolen Valor makes clear why, intentionally or not, events like "The
Sixties" slander all those who served in Vietnam. The fact is that Vietnam
veterans have fared as well or better than any other generation of warriors,
and it's about time that the myths that have tainted America's view of
Vietnam veterans are put to rest. By unmasking the despicable phonies who
have stolen the honor of the legitimate Vietnam veterans and exposing the
complicity of the press in this theft, Mr. Burkett has done an immense
service to his fellow veterans, and by extension to his country.
 
Mackubin Thomas Owens is an Adjunct Fellow of The Claremont Institute
http://www.claremont.org http://www.claremont.org, professor of
strategy and force planning at theNaval War College in Newport, RI, and a
Marine infantry veteran of Vietnam. He can be reached by e-mail at
mailto:[log in to unmask] mailto:[log in to unmask]










%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager