Hi everyone,
Louise Hitchcock wrote:
>To address Chris' comments: [Chris, being the guy who decided he was not
>feeling trivialized by a banal subject matter].
>By looking in the subject heading one can decide to hit the delete key
>so as not to feel trivialized by banal, or uninteresting subject matter
>(something I've learned to do on a routine basis).
So, you didn't think that Chris' comment was either banal or uninteresting?
Because if you did, you wouldn't have answered, because if you would, you
would have deleted the post as you do "on a routine basis", right?
Therefore, Chris' post must have been an interesting and valid response to
that which you were discussing. Which gives: why the hard feelings when
someone on this list write what s/he feels is important? Is there any
reasom to flame Chris just because he says something that he thinks is
valid? What kind of ethics do we want on this list?
Bjorn Andersson
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|