JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  February 1999

ACAD-AE-MED February 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Minor Injury Units

From:

"J.B." <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:45:05 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (78 lines)

Current changes in the management of minor injuries units are
amounting to a gradual (and quiet) revolution.

The development of the nurse practitioner means that more and more units
are able to run without the regular medical input from local GPs that
has been customary in the past. Trusts responsible for these MIUs have 
spotted an opportunity to save money by dispensing with the services of 
GPs (for the management of trauma at least), and instead passing full 
responsibility for clinical supervision of the unit to local consultants 
in A&E.

Since ENPs require less direct supervision than before (and are often
keen to take a more active role which will effectively utilise their
accumulated expertise) telephone support supplemented by regular visits
is a practical option for a supervising consultant, but it is a mistake
to think that this is "free" activity, which can be added indefinitely
to the workload of an already busy, and frequently over-burdened,
individual. This is particularly true where multiple units are involved,
each of which requires management and clinical input. Several minor
injuries units together may easily equal (or even exceed) the patient
turnover of the main department that they are supported from, and this
can be used as a powerful arguement for an expansion in consultant
numbers; a principle which has been successfully applied in at least one
department I am aware of.

The specialty would be wise to resist accepting complete responsibility
for more and more MIUs unless additional staff and funding are
forthcoming; a
reduction in GP input at these units may release the necessary funds,
but there is often a problem in re-allocating the money from one budget
to another. When considering consultant numbers and facilities according
to BAEM guidelines it may be most appropriate to count annual attendance
figures including all the MIUs that the service is responsible for.

Telemedicine provides an alternative way to support MIUs, but should not
been seen as a substitiute for regular visits; rather a way of providing
closer links and more accurate advice to improve the quality of care and
reduce patient transfers. Such equipment can also be budgeted for at the
time that the management of a local MIU is altered, but once in use
tends to occupy a substantial amount of consultant time at the central
A&E department since detailed advice will be regularly required,
particularly when the system is first set-up. This must also be
effectively allowed and budgeted for, ideally through the appointment
of additional staff or sessions.

I am currently preparing to research an MD thesis looking specifically
at
telemedical support of minor injuries units, and have therefore seen
quite a few local arrangements and encoutered very many viewpoints in my
preparatory
travels and visits. I would add that many of the patients who present to
MIUs are likely to fare better with input from a GP than from an ENP
supported by an A&E consultant.

Jonathan Benger.
SpR, Bristol  


[log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
> I look after 5 and am just being handed my sixth.  Politically they are terribly
> difficult to close and I feel that I have to accept them and do as good a job as
> possible.  They are certainly my most potent source of litigation and we're
> presently working with Purchasers etc. to tidy things up.  I agree with Carlos -
> they need to be heavily Risk Managed with strong protocols and audit - my
> protocols,  amongst other things,  determine the level of action that any one
> individual unit may proceed to as a satellite of the main A&E unit  eg.  a
> larger unit with NPs might suture etc.  whilst a smaller unit wihout NPs might
> only be allowed to register a patient,  dress a wound and refer onwards (extreme
> example!!) - with a whole spectrum in between.
> 
> Nick Jenkins
> Abergavenny



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager