It seems to me that the bigger issues that have been thrown out to
this list since DC6 ..... 1:1, relation, and the 'camp1' - 'camp2'
dichotomy ...... are most problematic when viewed from the
physical record or container perspective, and less of an issue
(maybe none at all) when considered from the very old-fashioned,
relational database perspective.
Were database models considered (even as a construct, perhaps?)
for working with the DC at the earlier conferences? Has it been
discussed on the lists or by the working groups?
I believe there were some folks at the DC6 meeting who operate
from and promote a traditional database approach to this work, and
I would really appreciate their views on the riddles contained within
the current 1:1/Admin Core/Bearman thread.
Ed
**************************************************************************
Edward McNeeley [log in to unmask]
Delaware Division of Libraries
43 S. DuPont Highway VOICE (302) 739-4748 ext.116
Dover, Delaware 19901 FAX (302) 739-6787
**************************************************************************
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|