JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  1999

PHD-DESIGN 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: Post Ohio

From:

"Rust, Chris" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 8 Feb 1999 12:35:48 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (49 lines)

Keith Russell said:

>>>Which leads us to the sorry state of affairs that many design students 
find themselves in. When design students say they are "practically 
finished" a thesis it often means that the design-as-object project is 
complete (in their minds) except for the literature search (called by most
students the research), the research (unknown to most students as an 
experience), the synthesis of divergent views and theories, the formation 
of
coherent ideas, the formal conceptualising of the project,  the writing up, 
the various stages of re-vision that only writing makes available, the 
subediting to style rules,  the bibliography, the title page, the multiple 
copying and the binding.<<<

I really don't recognise the conditions which Keith describes. Perhaps he 
could explain which students these are (subject, level of study) and what a 
"thesis" is within their programme. At postgraduate level we would not 
accept a piece of design work which did not have a substantial foundation 
of investigation and reflection (both in support of and through the vehicle 
of their creative work).

We make research processes a significant part of undergraduate project work 
and students are expected to present wide-ranging research work alongside 
their early concepts and as an explicit part of the process of identifying 
and developing opportunities. And I have seen good student work from 
Australia which seems to embody these same values. Of course there are 
students who are not bright enough or energetic enough to use research 
properly but I wouldn't register one of those for a PhD.

I would also suggest that, if Keith's experience of students' response to 
verbal criticism is genuinely reflected by:

"you talk critically about my toaster
and I'll kill you".

There must be a fundamental problem in the students' learning. My 
experience as a student and teacher is that students may not like criticism 
but they recognise its place in the process. Of course the spirit in which 
it is offered is extremely important.

Chris Rust ([log in to unmask])
Reader in Design
Sheffield Hallam University, uk




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager