At 20:38 14/3/99 +0000, George Pennefather wrote:
>since value is not simply
>economic value - as a political economist would have it - but social
>valorization, then, again, I don't see what is so controversial about
>this.
>
But what does this mean in concrete terms?
> If the state
>is conceived as an aspect or form of capital then the category capital, as
>conceived in Capital, is being challenged. Marx's Capital is thereby under
>attack too.
Why? Again, you are not really making your point clear.
>
>My point is both modest and significant.
>
So please could you explain it in simple terms. I would really love to
understand what you are arguing,
Fraternally,
John Walker
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|