Dear All,
I had conducted a test long time ago to assess the performance of both
SPM in MEDX and Matlab. I found that the resulting volumes of realignment
process seemed not so good by the SPM in MEDX. Meanwhile, I wrote an
e-mail to MEDX to ask about this question and they answered me that they
would modify this process in the further version.
Now, for some reason, I cannot follow this problem recently. I don't know
whether they (MEDX) does fix up this problem or not. However, the MEDX
provides an easy user interface for the users to read images with any
format. It's really indispensible for the users to read images with any
kind of image format without difficulty.
Jeng-Ren Duann, Ph. D.,
Inst. of Applied Physics and
Dept. of Biomedical Engineering,
Chung Yuan University, Chungli,
Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Jerry Allison wrote:
> Can anyone comment on the performance of SPM as implemented by MEDx versus conventional use of SPM as MatLab macros in a Unix or Linix environment?
>
> I believe the MEDx implementation is SPM96.
>
> Jerry Allison, Ph.D.
> Assoc. Prof. Radiology
> Medical College of Georgia
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|