JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

SPM  1999

SPM 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Correction for brain atrophy

From:

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 26 Oct 1999 17:55:27 +0100 (BST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/plain (73 lines)

If you are not already referring to it, then I would suggest taking a look
at:
Richardson et. al. (1997). "Cortical grey matter and benzodiazepine receptors
in malformations of cortical development. A voxel-based comparison of
structural and functional imaging data. Brain. 120:1961-1973

| We are working on atrophy correction based on T1 values of individual
| voxels This is outside of SPM. We wonder if atrophy correction could be
| done inside SPM by entering PET/SPECT and T1 MR images without the
| correction we are working on. The resolution of T1 MRI will be adjusted
| to the resolution of PET/SPECT images based on point-spread function for
| individual voxels. Therefore, spatial resolution of PET/SPECT and the
| resolution-adjusted T1 MRI is the same for individual voxels.
|
| Let's assume that we compare patients and healthy controls. Patients may
| show decreased uptake of radiotracer but it may be due to the decrease in
| gray matter volume. We want to separate the source of the decreased uptake.
| It may be due to the decreased uptake per gray matter volume, decreased
| gray matter volume without change in the uptake per gray matter volume, or
| both.
|
| Enter four sets of images, 1. patients' PET/SPECT, 2. controls' PET/SPECT,
| 3. patients' resolution-adjusted MRI, and 4, controls' resolution-adjusted
| MRI.
| How can we interpret the results by the contrast
| -1+1-(-1+1)?
| Will this contrast pick up the regions where the decrease in tracer uptake
| is significantly greater than the decrease in gray matter volume?

It should.

| However, the noise of the images is of course different. PET/SPECT images
| are much noisier. We wonder if images with different noise levels could be
| entered in the same analysis. Or do we need to add noise to the
| resolution-adjusted T1 MRI?

After smoothing, the noise should not be too much of a problem as most of
the residual variance should arise because the spatial normalization is
not exact. These errors should be the same for both the PET/SPECT and the
smoothed grey matter images.

You will probably need to be more concerned about the global intensity
normalization, since what you really want to test is pat_SPECT/pat_GM -
con_SPECT/con_GM. This is inherantly unstable, so an interraction between
the SPECT intensity and the smoothed GM is used instead. The optimum global
normalization would make the SPECT and GM intensities as similar as possible.
Sub-optimum globals may bias your results.

| Another concern is that spatial normalization may partially correct gray
| matter atrophy. In the nonlinear algorithm, thin gray matter could become
| thicker? Do we need to partially disable nonlinear algorithm in spatial
| normalization?

The grey matter could become thicker because of the nonlinear normalization,
but it should become equally thick in both the SPECT and the smoothed GM
images, so should not introduce additional interraction effects. Note that
even an affine normalization can make the cortex thicker, simply by globally
stretching a brain.

When doing any group comparisons, there will inevitably be some side
effects from the spatial normalization. For example, if one group has smaller
brains than the other, then the spatial normalization will enlarge the
smaller brains, thus increasing the cortical thickness. This may, or may
not be what you want to happen.


Good luck,
-John



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager