JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  1999

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: second stage and pushing

From:

" Sue/Randy O'Connor" <oconnors&[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:20:04 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (108 lines)

I am happy to see the responses to my 'nap' scenario, the CNM's here use
sleep  when possible in their hospital setting, though adding epidurals to
the equation is cheating, or Staydol induced naps....I'm talking natural
spacing and labour functions, like any muscle, the uterus can get tired,
and may need to re-energize. Sue

----------
> From: Bonitta Steuer <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: second stage and pushing
> Date: Monday, September 27, 1999 8:14 AM
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I've been procrastinating with my introduction, so here it is as well as
> some additional info. re. second stage.
> 
> I'm Bonny Steuer, CNM a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Boston
> University School of Public Health, Nurse-Midwifery Education Program.
> Having just finished my first year on faculty, sometimes overwhelmed with
> all it entails, I have yet to spread my wings in terms of my own
research,
> but am very interested in all the possibilities this group represents. 
> 
> I've been reading with interest the second stage discussion and would
> encourage those interested to also review the work/articles from Joyce
> Roberts:
> 
> Roberts J, Woolley D(1996)A second look at the second stage of labor.
JOGNN
> Vol. 25(5):415-423.
> 
> Aderhold KJ, Roberts JE (1991)Phases of second stage labor:Four
descriptive
> case studies. JNM 36(5):267275.
> 
> Roberts JE et aL (1987) A descriptive analysis of involuntarty bearing
down
> efforts during the expulsive phase of labor. JOGNN 16:48-55.
> 
> Roberts JE et al (1988) Supportive versus directive care in second stage
> labor. DHHS, NIH, NCNR Research Grant 5R01NR01500-02, Univ. of Colorado;
> 57-8, 64.
> 
> Hope this is of help.  Also to respond to the midwife who doubts you
could
> let a woman nap in hospital, while awaiting the urge to push. It does
> happen at the hospital where I practice, I'm happy to say, especially
with
> epidurals. A large inner-city public hospital with a medical staff
> supportive to midwifery philosophy. The midwives will soon be the
> supervisor/teacher for the intern MDs as well!
> 
> Bonny Steuer, CNM
>   At 12:28 PM 9/25/99 -0700, you wrote:
> >this will scew the results: a friend of mine took a two hour nap, after
> >reaching complete, then pushed the baby out in a short time.  OOH
situation
> >of course, this could hardly happen in a hospital.  I've had ladies
reach 6
> >cms, in a slow first stage, nap for a couple of hours, go to 10 cms in a
> >short time, then push the baby out.  Anyone doing a study on 'naps' for
> >maternal exhaustion?  Sue
> >
> >----------
> >From: Andy & Louise <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: second stage and pushing
> >Date: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 1:06 PM
> >
> >Dear All
> >
> >There is a school of thought that second stage of labour should be
> >redefined to include the decent of the presenting part (when the vertex
is
> >visible it is second stage).  If a woman's cervix is fully dilated but
the
> >head is at the spines she won't get that urge to push (Fergusson reflex)
> >therefore should we as midwives be directing her to push!  The issue of
how
> >long do you give at full dilatation should surely depend on the well
being
> >of the woman and the baby, if the FH is ok and the woman is coping well
> >with labour why not await events.  In my experience (be it limited as I
am
> >a 3rd year student)  waiting for the woman's body to define second stage
> >results in much more fulfilling outcome for mother and baby.  A lot of
> >women who are forced to push before their bodies are ready or before the
> >baby is in the right position become exhausted too quickly and very
often
> >need an assisted delivery. Another important aspect of this discussion
> >should include the position of the woman during her labour, we all know
> >that an upright posture aids descent which in turn aids progress in the
> >second stage.
> >
> >I hope my contribution to the discussion is of value as I really enjoy
the
> >list and I have learnt a lot of valuable information from it.
> >
> >love Louise Walker
> >
> >
> >
> 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager