JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BIOMIMETICS Archives


BIOMIMETICS Archives

BIOMIMETICS Archives


BIOMIMETICS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIOMIMETICS Home

BIOMIMETICS Home

BIOMIMETICS  1999

BIOMIMETICS 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: When biomimetics fails

From:

Adrian Bowyer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:05:16 +0000 (BST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (46 lines)


On Sun, 27 Dec 1998 09:23:54 +0000 (GMT) "Julian F. V. Vincent" 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> One of the problems in trying to develop an approach to doing science is
> finding the limits of applicability.  Where are the limits to the
> biomimetics / bionics approach?  What defines them?  Nominally one might
> say that non-biological areas such as high temperature, high speed and
> electronics cannot be a part of biomimetics.  But an analogue of wood made
> from GFRP can stop bullets; an analogue of nacre can withstand high
> temperature and be very tough; analogues of the wiring of the nervous
> system can give new types of electronics.  Where are the limits?  They
> have to be there.  Knowing where they are is essential when one comes to
> writing out a grant proposal or (more critically) taking on an industrial
> contract.  Underpromise and overdeliver is a good motto.  But the path of
> failure goes via overpromise and underdeliver.

People having evolved, natural selection (via the extended phenotype) now has 
access to temperatures from absolute zero to fusing hydrogen, and to any 
substance that a chemist can synthesize.  I realize that this is the equivalent 
of saying that people are a part of nature, and that therefore everything under 
the sun is natural.  Thus removing the word `artificial' from the language is 
probably unhelpful as it reduces the entropy of English by a tiny amount.  But 
it is true - a truth that illustrates the primary law of applied science (which 
I've just made up): The more fundamental a philosophical truth is, the less its 
practical application.

Yours unhelpfully but wishing a Happy New Year,

Adrian
_________________________________________________________________________
                                     |
Dr Adrian Bowyer                     |        email - [log in to unmask]   
Senior Lecturer                      | web - http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ensab
Department of Mechanical Engineering | telephone - +44 1225 826826 x 5453
Faculty of Engineering and Design    |              fax - +44 1225 826928
University of Bath                   |
Bath BA2 7AY                         |
UK                                   |
_____________________________________|___________________________________




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager