[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> Date: 24 February 1999 15:53 Subject: Re: one word reply - block/slot timetabl
>Please reply to [log in to unmask] and not to entire mailbase (unless you >think omnes et urbi should know your views) > > >These might all be one word replies but receiving them all is still a damn >nuisance. May I suggest that in future those wishing to garner information >in this way (as distinct from holding a genuine mail-base >exchange/discussion) head their request with their reply address clearly >stated. Colleagues seem far too keen to simply hit their "reply" buttons [...]42_24Feb199916:29:[log in to unmask] |