> there seems to be some good work but it is also
> mixed with strange notions.
You may not have meant it, but the description a "strange notion" could be
taken as an adverse criticism.
I don't think it is constructive to comment on Norman Marsh's extensive
contribution in such a vague manner. Which bits of it do you think are
strange?
Jan
[log in to unmask]
tel: +44 (0)181 725 2795 a.m. / 2652 p.m. (0)181 672 4122 p.m. answering machine
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|