JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ALLSTAT Archives


ALLSTAT Archives

ALLSTAT Archives


allstat@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ALLSTAT Home

ALLSTAT Home

ALLSTAT  1999

ALLSTAT 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Good Practice on Allstat

From:

(Ted Harding) <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:07:06 -0000 (GMT)

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (112 lines)

On 12-Nov-99 Alison Macfarlane wrote:
>
> If people that feel that such discussions are innappropriate on
> allstats, you are very welcome to have them on radstats, Radical
> Statitics email list.
>
> To join, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
>
> join radstats [your name]
>
> On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Robert Kinley wrote:
>
>> I echo the comments of Steve Taylor and others.
>>
>> If issues like the impact upon society of the use and abuse of
>> Statistics are not to be aired in Allstat, then where ?
>>
>> Personally, I'd like to see more exchanges of similar calibre to the
>> recent ones.

This is an old dilemma. Once in a while a topic likely to provoke good
discussion comes up on Allstat. However, not only do "people feel that
such discussions are innappropriate on Allstat": anything approaching
extended discusssion is officially frowned on and eventually gets
suppressed.

That, as far as it goes, is fair enough: it is apparently beyond the
remit under which Allstat was set up, to carry that kind of thing.
This was pointed out long ago in Stuart Young's days, and it hasn't
changed since Matt Whiley took over.

This is why, years ago and keeping in touch with Stuart Young about it,
I set up the list "stats-discuss". The intention was that interesting
discussion, which may have been intitiated on Allstat, could get
diverted to stats-discuss so that it could keep going without infringing
the modus operandi of Allstat and without getting up the noses of Allstat
subscribers who don't want to see it. And, of course, discussion could
also be initiated on stats-discuss.

However, the intitiative did not work out well. In the four years or
so that stats-discuss has existed, it has carried in total very few
messages. Occasionally, discussion initiated on Allstat has continued
briefly on stats-discuss, but it has always fizzled out rather quickly.
This contrasts interestingly with the enthusiasm with which people
attempt to pursue discussion on Allstat, to the point where the list
manager has to intervene.

My private interpretation of this is that people see Allstat as THE
Statistics list for the UK, read by the statistical community at large.
If they feel they have something interesting to say, this is where they
want to say it. They want a good audience. Therefore, even though
stats-discuss exists, it is not seen as a desirable port of call.

So there is the dilemma: people want their discussion to reach a wide
audience in the UK statistical community, but Allstat, officially, is
not the place for it. And the dilemma is not new.

Although there has been a sudden burst of some new subscriptions to
stats-discuss in the last few days, following the "Statistics and Justice"
thread started by Allan Reese and leading to "Good Practice on Allstat",
it hasn't been carrying much discussion -- in fact none since 30 Sept!

My reason for posting is to suggest an alternative which might break
the dilemma.

I believe that Allstat should have a "sister" list, intended for
discussion. Discussion can arise on Allstat, whose list manager can
decree that it should be continued on "Allstat-discuss" (or whatever
it's called) and can divert or copy messages thereto if necessary.

For this to work a it should, the subscribers to "allstat-discuss"
should be numerous and representative of the UK statistical community
(and of course anyone else who wants in). I don't have useful
suggestions for bringing this about.

I have nothing against RadStats -- indeed I was a card-carrying member
for some years -- but I can't see the UK community as a whole being
strongly tempted to subscribe to the "radstats" list with its rather
overt indications of an "agenda".

It seems to me that what our people will be tempted by is something
with a pedigree seemingly as august as Allstat, but allowing free
discussion. So it seems to me that it should live in the same stable.

Therefore, I would like to ask if Matt Whiley would be willing to
consider setting this up on similar lines to Allstat, and whether
he has ideas about how it could be set up so as to work well.

I'm sending this to the list at large, since it's an issue of general
interest; but clearly further talk about it should probably take place
off the Allstat list. If Matt says he's willing to receive and collate
views, perhaps (subject to his agreement) we should take this further
through him. Certainly, I am willing to receive replies myself, though
I have to point out that previous experience with stats-discuss suggests
that it may not be the most fruitful option in the long run!

I do feel that there is a need for a forum for discussion of issues
of importance, in Statistics generally and for UK Statistics in
particular ("Statistics and Justice" being a good case in point).

Best wishes to all,
Ted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 17-Nov-99 Time: 11:07:06
                                                3847974 seconds left
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager