JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN  1999

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Fructosamine

From:

Nils Tryding <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nils Tryding <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 21 Mar 1999 21:09:57 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (80 lines)

Dear Collegues,
We have recently published recommendations to primary care doctors concerning optimal use of laboratory tests .http://www.spri.se/frlag/rap-info/Rap476.htm
For several reasons we do not recommend fructosamine test:
Background
   Fructosamine is a color reaction to glucosulated serum proteins.
   Analysis of fructosamine has been presented as an inexpensive
   alternative to hemoglobin A1c determination. However, the
   reaction has been shown to be too unspecific to replace the
   increasingly well-established and generally recommended
   determination of hemoglobin A1c.


                    References
   142. Furuseth, K. et. al. - Fructosamine cannot replace
   HbA1c in the management of type2 diabetes (NIDDM).
   Scand.J.Prim.Health Care 1994;12:19-24.

   The study shows that serum fructosamine does not correspond
   well to blood hemoglobin A1c and cannot replace it.

   141. Jerntorp, P. et. al. - Clinical utility of serum
   fructosamine in diabetes mellitus compared with
   hemoglobin A1c. Clinica Chimica Acta
   1988;175:135-142.

   The fructosamine test is not an alternative to hemoglobin A1c.

With kind regards
Nils Tryding

Box 57, S-296 21 Åhus, Sweden

> Tel: +46 44 241260
> Fax: +46 44 240007

> E-mail: [log in to unmask]

URL: http://home1.swipnet.se/~w-12360

>

"McNeely, Michael" wrote:

> Of interest, this test is being pushed by commercial interests in the USA.  I enclose below some material from a product advertisement (not my composition).
>
> Michael McNeely MD FRCPC
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> A fructosamine test has been available through laboratories since the early 1980s. The main advantage of the test is that it can detect overall changes in blood glucose control within a few weeks, rather than months. Fructosamine levels indicate the level of blood glucose control over the past two or three weeks. So, when changes are being made in a diabetes treatment plan, this test can indicate in a more timely fashion than an A1c test how well the changes are working and whether other changes should be considered.
> In late 1997, the Food and Drug Administration approved the Duet Glucose Control Monitoring System marketed by LXN Corporation in San Diego California for home use in adults (excluding children and pregnant women). This testing system includes a blood glucose test and the first home fructosamine test in one hand-held meter. The meter and a starter pack of test strips cost about $300, and strips can be reordered at a cost of about $64 for eight strips.
> According to the manufacture, a reading below 310 micromoles per liter in this home fructosamine test is considered acceptable and a reading over 380 is very high and requires a change in treatment plan.
> The new home test can be potentially helpful for people making changes in their diabetes treatment plan. It can also be helpful to people with diabetes who do not closely monitor their blood sugar levels with multiple daily home tests. But, a once-a-week fructosamine test should not be considered a substitute for daily monitoring, and should not take the place of regular visits to your doctor and regular hemoglobin A1c tests. Also, a normal fructosamine test doesn't mean that your blood sugars have been normal for the past 2-3 weeks. Someone with wide swings in blood sugar levels - lots of highs and lows - would also have a normal fructosamine test, but would really have serious problems with their overall treatment plan that require adjustment. This would be uncovered by frequent daily home blood sugar monitoring Also, people should not be tempted to shoot for too low of a fructosamine level, as this might result in dangerous low blood sugars.
> This relatively new home test offers new information and more information than home blood sugar monitoring and hemoglobin A1c provide. For people who are changing a treatment program it may be particularly useful. For those who currently are not doing frequent blood sugar tests at home, it may provide a first step towards getting oriented more towards home testing and taking action in your overall diabetes management.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 1999 8:26 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Fructosamine
>
> I have had an esquire from somebody who would like to have fructosamine
> measured on a few samples.
> Does anyone still do this?
> It is not listed on the assay finder.
>
> Gerald A Maguire
> Dept of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Immunology
> Addenbrooke's Hospital
> Cambridge
> UK
> CB2 2QR
> UK
> Tel 44 (0) 1223 217159
> fax 44 (0) 1223 216862



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager