The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  October 1998

DISABILITY-RESEARCH October 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: UK/US disability discourses

From:

Lennard Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 20 Oct 1998 10:20:21 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (196 lines)

Hi Mairian,

Well, I don't think I need to reply now since I basically agree with what
you've said.  I suppose I have somewhat more of a sense that if you ignore
history that you are doomed to repeat it.  I know you are not ignoring it
at all but weighing the usefulness of certain kinds of historical
procedures and methods of disseminating information.  Again, I agree that
we need to be suspicious of history since it can be used to justify
anything in the present.

On the other side, revisionist history has to a large sense empowered
groups, albeit at the price of reinscribing binaries.  I like the work of
Wendy Brown, (have you seen it?) STATES OF INJURY (Princeton, 1995) who
talks about how identity politics comes at the price of ratifying certain
norms and maintaining a "wounded" identity to keep the sense of difference
alive--the same difference that created the injured state.  I just wrote a
piece for NOVEL on the subject.  I think it will be out within a few months.  

Another point, the distinction between readers of the past (ie historians)
and readers of the present (ie people who live in the present).  This has
always struck me as a spurious argument since people living in the present
are no better readers of "now" then they would have been of "then."  Newt
Gingrich and I both inhabit the same contemporary moment but read the
present as differently as we read the past.  Likewise, Sir Francis Galton's
reading of his moment is not necessarily more correct than my reading of
his moment.

I do think that in your work with Deaf children, you have to perform a
complex task of balancing what is going on in a particular situation with
what you know, what others have known, what others have said and done, and
the demands of what is being said and done now.  This is the complex dance
of theory and praxis, but as Marx said to mother, you can't have one
without the other.  And part of theory involves a synchronic element but
also a diachronic one.  

Re: binaries.  I'm not for them, but they do, according to a Sausurian
model, create meaning.  OK, Derrida shows us that this model is ultimately
false because all meaning comes from deferring difference.  But this
explanation doesn't mean that we should not think using the meaning that
binaries create.  It is sort of like the fact that we live in a Newtonian
world although the rules of his physics don't apply to off-Earth
situations. We maintain that consciousness, although we still operate as if
only Newtonian rules apply.  It is perhaps certain binaries we don't like
because they create or participate in oppressive systems.  I like to
resolve the binary problem throught dialectics.  This gives me a way to
understand the binary and transcend it when necessary.

Also, here, only a voice, a set of problems, a wondering aloud.

Best,

Lennard 

 At 12:09 PM 10/20/1998 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi Lennard,
>
>You wrote:
>>
>>I've read through your comment at least three times, and I do not
>>understand what you are saying.  Please rephrase.  Are you saying that
>>academic studies of the discourse of disability and normality only end up
>>reinscribing the binary?
>
>I am saying that certain kinds of academic discourse end up reinscribing
>the binary
>
>-       through their objectification of disabled people
>-       through distracting from disabled people's lives as they are lived
now
>-       through the privileging of particular kinds of 'knowledge'
>-       through marginalising disabled people because they are inaccessible.
>
> Are you saying that historical work is
>>antithetical to the lived experience of people today?
>
>It can be if
>
>-       we become preoccupied with it
>-       we universalise it
>-       we forget the context of the society/culture we live in today.
>
>What I mean is that say we discover an historical context when disabled
>people were supposedly not oppressed. As an example here, I would use the
>oft-quoted case of Martha's Vineyard (where deaf and hearing people
>coexisted in a bilingual environment). This is promoted as the
>quintessential example of an 'enabling' society and social inclusion (as UK
>theory describes it). I am not saying that this is untrue (on the grounds
>of historical evidence), nor am I arguing against sign language.
>
>However, I would argue strongly that contemporary commentators leave out a
>great deal of information in order to give credence to versions of this
>particular 'truth'. For example, historical evidence tells us that there
>were large numbers of deaf people on Martha's Vineyard and this was said to
>be as a result of a 'deaf gene'. Secondly, geographically, Martha's
>Vineyard was isolated from the mainland which meant it was more likely that
>people made the best of what they had on site and that they were
>correspondingly less likely to be influenced by the mainland. Thirdly, the
>deaf gene died out through an influx of settlers from the mainland and
>intermarriage. (If any of this analysis is incorrect then please tell me as
>I am working on the basis of what I have read).
>
>It seems to me that Martha's Vineyard has a number of messages which might
>be relevant, namely that (in these circumstances):
>
>1. Sustained social and linguistic contact
>2. Equity in numbers
>3. A common, collective, democratically determined economic goal
>4. Discrete geographical boundaries
>
>enable the removal of barriers, economic survival, and the promotion social
>inclusion. This may or may not be true in other historical contexts.
>Today's Deaf activists promote bilingualism or, more commonly,
>monolingualism (using this example as evidence) coupled with segregated
>education and social coexistence (which, over here anyway, means
>separatism). This is happening at a time when social exclusion is high on
>the political agenda. In these circumstances I find it difficult to marry
>historical evidence with contemporary lived experience unless the purpose
>of historical analysis is curiosity or 'academic interest'.
>
>However, while deaf people remain oppressed, I also think it is important
>the keep in mind the broad gamut of such 'knowledge' in all of its many
>interpretations. For example, I have recently been working in schools with
>deaf kids. In one school (a mainstream school) there are large numbers of
>deaf kids who use sign language. School structures (curriculum, staffing,
>architectural and so on) segregate these kids in the academic life of the
>school and the kids say they are bullied unless they stay together
>(collective strength resulting from the reproduction of these structures).
>However, once a term I think, there is an activity week where the
>structures are relaxed and the kids have to come together negotiate
>collectively particular tasks to achieve a goal. When I observed this, I
>saw no sign of bullying - I actually never saw any bullying of the deaf
>kids but quite a lot amongst the hearing kids (though this is not to say
>that the deaf kids weren't bullied). Though the activities began with the
>deaf kids being marginalised, as time went on the barriers began to come
>down. The hearing kids were trying to think how to 'include' the deaf kids
>and communicate with them. When I commented on this, one of the deaf kids
>said 'oh we'll be back to 'normal' next week'. When I went back, the
>structures were back in place along with the segregation. I've seen this in
>others schools also. It may be difficult for some to make the connection,
>but this is what I mean about theoretical knowledge being useful and
>translatable.
>
> How are you defining
>>academic--as something of no use to people outside of the academy?
>
>Again, I wouldn't generalise the term academic. Clearly there ARE some
>things that are of no USE to people outside the academy - knowledge for
>knowledge's sake - though these same things may be OF INTEREST to many. It
>is also true that not all disability research emanating from the academy is
>emancipatory for the same reasons. In contexts where disabled people do not
>have full civil or human rights in law (and I believe legal enforcement -
>formal justice - to be of primary importance in individualist societites),
>the emancipatory potential of this research is clearly more important. Some
>of these arguments about the role of the academy have also been hammered
>out within feminism. Some feminists believe that feminism has retreated
>into the academy because it hasn't been successful in rooting out
>oppression. Some disabled people feel the same.
>
> I'd
>>like to know what your position is before I respond at greater length.
>>
>That's fine, though I hope that the moderation of my tone is clear. I am
>not in any way arguing a position in the sense that it is THE position,
>only that it is one position among many which is reflexively fighting for
>'voice'.
>
>Best
>
>
>Mairian
>
>*********
>
>"To understand what I am doing, you need a third eye"
>
>*********
>
>Mairian Corker
>Senior Research Fellow
>University of Central Lancashire
>c/o 111 Balfour Road
>Highbury
>London N5 2HE
>U.K.
>
>Minicom/TTY      +44 [0]171 359 8085
>Fax              +44 [0]870 0553967
>Typetalk (voice) +44 [0]800 515152 (and ask for minicom/TTY number)
>
>
>



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager