JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for INTARCH-INTEREST Archives


INTARCH-INTEREST Archives

INTARCH-INTEREST Archives


INTARCH-INTEREST@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

INTARCH-INTEREST Home

INTARCH-INTEREST Home

INTARCH-INTEREST  September 1998

INTARCH-INTEREST September 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

CALL FOR COMMENTARY (fwd)

From:

Judith Winters <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 7 Sep 1998 15:56:12 +0100 (BST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (174 lines)

----- Forwarded message from Stevan Harnad -----

                  CALL FOR COMMENTARY in
             American Scientist September Forum
    http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september-forum.html

The following proposal to change copyright argeements and funding
practises so authors can freely archive their work on the Web has just
appeared in Science on Sept. 4, followed by a dissenting Editorial:

     INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Who Should Own Scientific Papers?
     Bachrach et al.
     Science 1998 September 4: 1459-1460

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/1459

     EDITORIAL: The Rightness of Copyright.
     Bloom, F. 
     Science 1998 September 4: 1451.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/281/5382/1451

For the time being, Science is allowing anyone to access both the
proposal and the dissenting Editorial by Floyd Bloom (Editor, Science)
for free (after some signup procedures) at:

http://www.sciencemag.org/

Discussion (including quote/comments from the proposal and the
Editorial) is invited in the Forum below [not a USENET group].

Read the papers, and then comment at:

http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september-forum.html

Here are some highlights:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Who Should Own Scientific Papers?

Steven Bachrach, R. Stephen Berry, Martin Blume, Thomas von Foerster,
Alexander Fowler, Paul Ginsparg, Stephen Heller, Neil Kestner, Andrew
Odlyzko, Ann Okerson, Ron Wigington, Anne Moffat*

    "...The goals and motivations of scientists writing up their
    research are very different from those of professional authors,
    although they may be the same people in different settings. The
    scientist is concerned with sharing new findings, advancing
    research inquiry, and influencing the thinking of others. The
    benefits the scientist receives from publication are indirect;
    rarely is there direct remuneration for scientific articles.
    Indeed, scientists frequently pay page charges to publish their
    articles in journals. The world of the directly paid author is very
    different. There, the need for close protection of intellectual
    property follows directly from the need to protect income, making
    natural allies of the publisher and the professional author,
    whether a novelist or the author of a chemistry text..."

    "...The suggested policy is this: Federal agencies that fund
    research should recommend (or even require) as a condition of
    funding that the copyrights of articles or other works describing
    research that has been supported by those agencies remain with the
    author. The author, in turn, can give prospective publishers a
    wide-ranging nonexclusive license to use the work in a value-added
    publication, either in traditional or electronic form.  The author
    thus retains the right to distribute informally, such as through a
    Web server for direct interaction with peers..."

    "...[Some publishers, such as] Science, the New England Journal of
    Medicine, and the Journal of the American Chemical Society, have
    adamantly opposed authors' posting of their own articles on Web
    pages or e-print servers, whereas others, such as the American
    Journal of Mathematics, the Journal of Neuroscience, Nature
    Medicine, and Physical Review, have considered such distribution
    consistent with, and even advertising for, their own journals..."

------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDITORIAL The Rightness of Copyright: Floyd E. Bloom

    "...[C]opyright transfer is critical to the process of
    communicating scientific information accurately. Neither the public
    nor the scientific community benefits from the potentially
    no-holds-barred electronic dissemination capability provided by
    today's Internet tools. Much information on the Internet may be
    free, but quality information worthy of appreciation requires more
    effort than most scientists could muster, even if able...."

Questions for Reflection [SH]:

(1) Is this a logical or even a practical argument for copyright
transfer?

(2) Is the only choice really that between free papers, with no quality
control, versus quality-controlled papers in exchange for copyright
transfer and S/SL/PPV?

    "...A paper submitted to Science will undergo extensive review and,
    upon acceptance, extensive revision for clarity, accuracy, and
    solidity. A paper published in Science will be seen throughout the
    world by our 160,000 paid subscribers and perhaps two or three
    times more readers as issues are shared. More than 30,000 readers
    will be alerted to the new reports within hours of the appearance
    each week of Science Online...."

(3) How many journals reach 160K subscribers (or even 1/100 % of that)?

(4) Free posting on the Web can reach all 160K (and 100 times that).

(5) Science magazine is a hybrid trade/refereed journal. It publishes
refereed articles, contributed for free, plus commissioned and paid
articles by staff writers and others, for fee. Hence it is in most
relevant requests not representative of the vast refereed literature of
which it (and a few other journals like it, such as Nature) constitutes
a minuscule portion.

    "...This degree of investment in the scientific publication process
    requires the assignment of copyright. This allows the society
    publisher to provide a stewardship over the paper, to protect it
    from misuse by those who would otherwise be free to plagiarize or
    alter it, and to expand the distribution of information products
    for the benefit of the society.

(6) Do we need this degree of investment? Is it worth the consequences
(S/SL/PPV, fire-walls)?

(7) What is "stewardship"?

(8) What do copyright ASSIGNMENT (to the publisher) and S/SL/PPV have
to do with protection from plagiarism or alteration? (Doesn't copyright
simpliciter provide that?)

    "...Permissions are granted freely to the originating authors for
    their own uses. Science holds the copyright of its authors because
    of our belief that we materially improve and protect the product we
    create together...."

(9) What if the "own use" is the provision of one's work to others,
through free public archiving on the Web?

(10) Would payment for the cost of the improvements not be sufficient,
without the need for copyright assignment, S/SL/PPV and firewalls?

[Again, this should all be considered in conjunction with the fact that
Science magazine is far from representative of refereed journals, for
the reasons noted above.]

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stevan Harnad                     [log in to unmask]
Professor of Cognitive Science    [log in to unmask]
Department of Electronics and     phone: +44 1703 592582
Computer Science                  fax:   +44 1703 593281
University of Southampton         http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/
Highfield, Southampton            http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM           ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/


end of forwarded message


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Judith Winters,  Assistant Editor,  Internet Archaeology
http://intarch.ac.uk
King's Manor,  University of York,  YO1 7EP,  UK 
[log in to unmask]  |  Tel: +44 1904 433955  |  Fax: +44 1904 433939

Join our mailbase discussion group - details at
http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/intarch-interest/






%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
March 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
September 2012
August 2012
April 2012
March 2012
December 2011
October 2011
July 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
June 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
September 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
February 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager