Just a point to make in reply to this. Here in Highland we write into
our specifications for all dveloper-funded work that the contractor must
present the results to local people within a specified time after the
end of the project. many of them choose to do this as part of our
Archaeology week but others make different arrangements. Of course,
where archaeological watching briefs on the construction of one-off
bungalows produce nothing (we get pleanty of those) there's nothing to
tell. But big developments in / around Inverness have led to some
excellent contributions to our annual free 'What's new in Highland
Archaeology' seminar. Come and see or hear this for yourselves: the
next seminar is on 8-9 August. Details from me.
In message <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
> Hello Steve,
> Interesting to hear your suggestion of Roadshows, we have been running
> one for the last 3 years in Cambridgeshire, however the main problem
> is funding it. Although part of the County Council the Field Unit
> receives ZERO funding for any education/public events. We fund talks
> by charging schools, which actually works fine, and other events
> through other agencies but not the County Council. The Roadshow is
> free and designed to inform about archaeology and hopefully attract
> more schools to take up the Education Programme/Projects we run.
> However we have to work on a very limited budget. There is great
> competition in Cambridgeshire with a lot of outside units undercutting
> to win projects and lower the standards of archaeology (in my
> opinion). NONE of these units do any Schools/Education/Public events
> etc.. They do however benefit from the investment we put in which is
> a bit vexing. One 'roving' unit even got money from a developer to
> carry out an education project, did nothing and then asked the County
> Council to borrow our displays to fulfil its obligation!!!!
> Cambridgeshire County Council runs a large Public Archaeology, Schools
> and Education service, as well as Monument Management etc.. As far as
> I know as much as anywhere else, however how much longer this can be
> maintained is another question. The largest singe funding source for
> Education comes from Countryside Stewardship grants!!!.
> Competitive Tendering/PPG 16 is reducing this type of work not
> increasing it. we seem to be in a Chicken and Egg position, if we are
> hoping to improve the archaeology profession by a higher profile, when
> it is exactly this type of work which is removed first. In
> Cambridgeshire we have no County Archaeologists, only Development
> Control Officers and SMR, which are seen to be the priority.
> Okay rant is over, any thoughts!!??
>______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
>Subject: Re: Replies to 'depressing state of affairs'
>Author: "Steve Newport" <[log in to unmask]> at ~Internet
>Date: 28/07/98 10:49
>First constructive suggestion I have seen. Whatever little I could
>contribute I'm in.
>You asked for ideas. Well just a couple of initial comments, they;re off the
>top of my head so don;t laugh too much.
>1) I will allways remember my last year at school. We had several people
>giving talks about a variety of subjects.
>They always say that political movements often get the best results by
>targeting children and this could be a legitimate place to begin. Perhaps a
>national and co-ordinated programme of Archeological Road Shows touring the
>schools. Organsied by local archeology units, perhaps in conjunction with
>local archeological societies.
>With approaching the children you will have an opportunity to catch the
>imagination early. Here you can get across the message about the low career
>prospects for students so that the prospective students get a clear idea of
>what they would be getting into.
>Also you can (with due though and consideration) give them an idea about the
>archeology around them, but take the oportunity to make the history behind
>2) Use CAMRA (like the name) as a rally point to lobby for greater exterior
>control of these Developers Archeological Units.
>3) It can also act as a body to co-ordinate funds for the
>'tousist-archeological development of the site.' I know you implied that the
>tourist pound was not sufficient to support archeology but there is another
>important aspect to it. If there is a tourist site active on the stop it
>acts to resist development in other ways. If its scrub land, it gets built
>Remember, I want to be in !
>>Let's start the Campaign for Real Archaeology - (inspired by someone using
>>the CAMRA example).
>> - To promote archaeological work and awareness of its importance
>> - To move archaeology out of the 19th century
>> - To get quality archaeology and archaeologists by establishing a
>> within which decent jobs (dare I say careers?) can be created and