At 10:49 AM +0800 5/25/98, Simon Cox wrote:
>> I don't think we've a consensus on this yet, but looking at the
>> document as a whole, it seems clear that this section is not
>> consistent with the rest of our approach to Simple DC.
>
>
>Do you mean that it is a more complete/prescriptive treatment?
>Yes, I think that, so far, RELATION is the only element to be
>blessed with ratified list of recommended values. This is a GOOD
>thing, and should not be lightly abandoned. The RELATION wg did a
>good job over a short period, very ably facilitated by David
>Bearman. I guess it was the only wg arising from Helsinki
>that successfully reported and wound itself up. Seems a shame
>to now ignore that effort because of the lack of balance from
>some other wg's ... (I share the brickbats for a couple of the
>other groups).
I strongly agree with Simon
|