JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS  1998

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Fred Beake: Poetics

From:

Douglas Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Douglas Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 6 Mar 98 20:31:10 GMT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (272 lines)

This paper was commisioned By Patricia Oxley, editor of `Acumen' magazine,
from Fred Beake and will be published in `Acumen' in the near future.
I was so interested in it that I have asked Fred if I can distribute
advance copies on the Internet. Nobody knows more about verse rhythms
in English than Fred. `Acumen' is available from "6 The Mount,
Higher Furzeham, Brixham, South Devon TQ5 8QY."

.......


NOTES AND COGITATIONS ON THE LINE AND THE FOOT IN FREE VERSE /Fred Beake

A poem moves in time from a point to a point, whether it is read aloud or
silently. Our perception of it is as much in the memory of what has just
passed as in the immediate words passing before our eyes and ears.

The force of the poem builds up by the wave patterns that are occasioned by
the movement of the breath, and we call lines. Breath however is not the
whole of it. When William Carlos Williams in a late poem talked of "the ear
and the eye lieing down together in the same bed" he was putting his finger
on a basic process that applies to all poetry written in a culture that has
gone beyond the purely oral. This applies equally to the way we read a
Keats ode, and a twentieth century free verse poem, such as Williams
himself might have written.

So far so good, but what is a line? Historically of course it is finite
unit composed of a group of feet. However, the actual definition of foot is
very various. The Romans and Greeks used a highly sophisticated patterning
by long and short syllables i.e. time duration. This was a result in all
probability of either Latin and Greek lacking the heavy accentuation that
characterises English for most of its history, or (possibly) to fit in with
various musical systems we now know little about. Thus, to take a very
simple example of what quantity sounded like, here are two lines from Hesiod
, written in the six foot line that the ancients called the Hexameter

     Take notice       when you hear the voice of the crane
     Phracksesthai d', eut'an geranou phonen epakouseis

     highup from the clouds making its annual shriek
     upsothen ek nepheon eniausia kekleeguees.

The Roman/Greek system however only used one form of long, and one of short
syllable. One idea which is hard to cope with at first is that a syllable
is short or long, as much by what comes after it, as by its own time value. Long
vowels are always long. Thus"I cry" is two long syllables, and "a book"
with no words after is two short syllables. However, if "book" is followed by
another consonant it becomes long e.g. in "a book makes"  "book" is long,
but in "a book is" it is short. In simple terms two consonants before a
vowel, whether in the same word or not, create a long.

The value of this to a modern poet is not in recreating the classic meters,
which rarely seem to work in English, but as a useful guide to the
patterning of a free verse line. Often to scan a line into its syllable
lengths is I find very helpful, in some way it seems to clarify what is
wrong. This is especially so, given the tendency of modern english to
become much more like American, and much flatter in tone, i.e. with much
less accentuation of syllables. Try it, but remember a modern English line
is not necessarily a conjunction of classical feet: English has its own
patterns. Short, short, long, seems comon to my ear in modern speech, but
there are others I am sure.

After the classical scanning by quantity, which arguably never had great
relevence to English poetry before free verse, the story is dominated by
two systems with quite seperate histories.

Firstly, there is scansion by syllable groups, or lifts, allied to
alliteration. This is called the Alliterative line, and has four groups to
a line . It has a long history from before Beowulf in the Dark Ages through
to the Fifteenth century. One of its greatest periods was just before its
close with the Gawaine Poet and Langland in the last part of the Fourteenth
Century. Thus from Gawaine and the Green Knight

        After,/ the sesoun/ of somer/ wyth the soft wyndes
        Quen Zeferus/ syfles himself/ on sedes/ and erbes

or from Piers Ploughman

         In a somer/ seson,/ whan softe/ was the sonne,
         I shoop me/ into shroudes/ as I/ a sheep were

One interesting result of this system is that (while there are exceptions)
most syllable groups are two or three syllables, occasionally four.

This we will return to because it seems to me that this sort of English in
many ways is closer to ours than anything in between.

This was however gradually replaced from Chaucer on with a system, derived
from France of lines of fixed number of syllables, divided into usually two
syllable feet, each foot having one stress. The positioning of stresses is
much more regular in some generations than others. One has only to go from
Marlow to Webster to realize this, and Milton is much more irregular than Pope
or Dryden. Nevertheless I think it is fair to say that English poetry from
Chaucer and Gower on is dominated by ten and eight syllable measures, using
two syllable feet i.e. the octosyllabic and decasyllabic rhymed couplets,
and the ten syllables of blank verse. Lyric measures were of course more
complex, but as a general rule, because of the dominance of the two
syllable foot, they compose measures of six, eight,ten, and occasionally
twelve or four syllables. The odd poem of course has lines of three or
five or seven.

This is a system of chant, that makes lines fall and rise with
extraordinary inevitability, and as such works marvellously well aloud.
Witness Absolom and Achitophel, Ode to the West Wind, Paradise Lost. etc,
etc. Nevertheless it came to seem monotonous to the Nineteenth century, who
seem instinctively (rather than from any scholarly concept) to have reached
away from the two syllable foot into something more irregular, and more
like the medieval. Thus Browning's once popular anthology piece

            Your ghost/ will walk/ you lover/ of trees
                 (If our loves/ remain)
                 In an/ English lane
             By a/ cornfield side/ aflutter/ with poppies.
             Hark,/ those two/ in the /hazel coppice -
             A boy/and a girl/, if the good fates /please

Now one could get into all sorts of arguments about correct stresses, but
this simple scansion by foot does show Browning (while in some ways
sounding quite like the late eighteenth century) breaking away from two
syllable feet into irregular measures of one to four syllables. Browning
probably got the idea from Chatterton's experiment with medievalise, or
from the recently revived ballads,but at least he was breaking the mold.

Yet the Nineteenth century revolution was dominated by Hopkins and Whitman.
Hopkins, for all his irregularities, was using a highly coherent system. If
you will bother to read his preface he was thinking of a sprung foot of
usually one to four syllables with one primary stress i.e. syllable
pronounced harder than the rest. It does not seem to be true that his
his system ignored feet, and worked by stress count only. This indeed is an idea
that comes not from Hopkins, but from the practice (often very interesting)
of many late Nineteeth and early Twentieth century english poets, following
on from what  Browning in the above extract or Swinburne say were doing. The
popular music of Drake's Drum for example seems to alternate lines of six
and five stresses, with little evidence of any thought about feet in
Browning or Hopkins' sense. Yet Hopkins was important.

This is because he got into what happens when lines are composed
of irregular syllable groups, and the traditional rhythms of the two
syllable foot, are ignored.

Whitman though broke through into the possibilities of irregular feet,
without regarding stresses, driven by the breath of the chanter. Possibly
he was led in this direction by the natural flatness of American.His
practice is interesting for two reasons today. 1.it is breath driven 2. His
lines are highly irregular in the numbers of syllables in the feet, but
often seem to have something like six feet e.g.

           When/ lilacs/ last/ in the/ dooryard/bloomed
           And the/ great star/ early drooped/ in the/ western sky/ in the night
           I mourned/ and yet/ shall mourn/ with ever/ returning/ spring.

This leads back to the classical hexameter that we glimpsed in Hesiod.
Though the method is different in everything except the fact of six feet to
a line, the governing principle of the foot in Whitman and Hesiod seems
similar. In both poets' system each foot takes a similar time to speak.

In the Twentieth century many flowers have bloomed prosodically speaking in
England and America. Nevertheless the arguments we have just glimpsed
emerging in the Nineteenth century  have in many ways remained central  to
Free Verse. There have been two opposite tendencies, which are nevertheless
closely connected.

1. To use lines of syllable groups e.g. the Wasteland's brilliant opening
in four foot lines

              April/ is the / cruellest month/, breeding
              Lilacs/ out of/ the dead land,/ mixing
              Memory/ and/ desire,/stirring
              Dull/ roots/ with spring/rain.

This with all the variations, not least the absense of formal alliteration,
is not that far from Langland and Gawaine. Yet it is more various than
them, not least because Eliot's system works by periodic extension or
diminution e.g.  in the Four Quartets The Dry Salvages seems to open with
lines of six feet.

An interesting problem with some lines is whether they scan as five feet or
four. Thus the late Jon Silkin in his book The Life of Metrical and Free
Verse in the Twentieth Century believed the opening of Lawrence's The Ship
Of Death to be a clear five foot line with iambic overtones because ofthe
placement of its stresses.
                              /        /        /     /       /
                   Have you built your ship of death, O have you

In fact I think the whole of the opening of the Ship of Death  scans as
four foot lines, and Silkin's attempts to introduce an irregularity by
mixing four and five stress lines is a confusion based on ignoring groups
of four syllables e.g.

                  Have you built/your ship of death,/O/ have you

This does however lead to the point that alternative scansions of the same
line by different systems is possible, and sometimes it is a question of
which system it is most useful for the poet to scan his work by.

2. To use syllable groups as self contained units, in often very short
lines. This leads to very tight control, which is arguably easier to
maintain than in 1. This is a large topic and not easily illustrated by one
example. I suggest those that are interested read their way through William
Carlos Williams, whose work prosodically speaking is a constant variation
of the possibilities of this.  However here is an example from Lorine
Neidecker, that is more immediately obvious than Williams.

              His holy
                    slowly
                        mulled over
                matter

              not all 'delirium
                    of delight'
                          as were the forests
                of Brazil

It seems little noticed by either her friends or enemies that much of late
Plath uses highly intelligent variations on this system. Thus (from Ariel)

                Stasis in darkness.
                Then the substanceless blue
                Pour of tor and distances.

However by approximating her lines to a breath (like William) but making
the line  longer than Williams, Plath manages to retain something of the
older systems, rather like a tonal composer such as Malcolm Arnold
introducing twelve note elements into tonal composition e.g. from Morning
Song

                 Love set you going like a fat gold watch.
                 The midwife slapped your footsole, and your bald cry
                 Took its place among the elements

The essense of any writing in breath related measures is awareness of the
movement of the breath, but also of the eye on the page. Personally I think
Plath, Williams and the Objectivists offer the most real way forward for
free verse today.

Yet not everything in the Twentieth Century is free verse. There has been
good deal of innovation in lyric forms, which is in danger of being
forgotten. For example Dylan Thomas fused the motion of the new free verse
with more fixed forms. These may have been based on the number of syllables
in the line, which may have owed something to his early reading of Blake's
Prophetic Books, which often seem to be irregular syllabics (though did
Thomas have at least the idea of the classical scansion by length of
syllable at the back of his head?). Thus Fern Hill seems to be composed of
lines of 14, 9, or 6 syllables. Structurally the poem turns on the
possibilities of three and two syllable feet. The nine syllable lines have
to have three syllable feet e.g. "In the sun/born over/ and over". The six
syllable are ambiguous, but are usually three feet of two e.g. "Time
held/me green/and dying". The fourteeners are a mixture of the two  e.g
"Nothing/ I cared/, in the lamb/white days/, that time/would take me". The
rhythm seems partly at least out of the old ballads, which (like the
Alliterative poets) also regularly mix two and three syllable feet. Analysis
by standard stress pattern seems inappropriate. And in the same vein I
would mention the little known Edward Boaden Thomas' refashioning of lyric
form to fit modern  English speech.

Finally I speak as a practicing poet and critic. It seems to me that free
verse increasingly is being taken to mean what its enemies originally
called it i.e. "chopped up prose". The reason is that all the basic tools
of rhythmic procedure are being tossed to one side. Nobody scans for
quantity, few listen to the length of their syllables in time. Nobody
bothers to break their lines down in to the smaller units of 1-4 syllables
that Hopkins identified, and  the  medieval poets used. Hence the
confusion about what is poetry and what prose. Why cannot we write poetry
out as prose, etc? This would not matter, except that when we read great
poetry, whether it is Milton or Dryden, Shelley or Williams, Eliot or Dylan
Thomas, we are reading something much better than prose. We get a music of
sounds and rhythms that amplifies the sense, and often subtly changes it
into something much better. The tools to do this in modern free verse
exist. We must rediscover our feet, and stand on them!.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager