My grumpy marks about the amilbase were made before I had read John
Wilkinson's exemplary piece on Prynne (I missed the mailings he's
respoinding to).
The anecdote offers a mode of accessing Prynne (and I suspect
Wilkinson too), in their textual and textural complexities.
Now to try to integrate that into my current Levinasian musings upon the
distinction between the saying and the said: were the bus-speakers
demonstrating the fluid saying as against the fossilisng said.
Then on to Kristeva's Revolution in Poetic Language (whch I think I read
years ago, or bits of). The campus book shop announced a sale, so I
shot up there):
and then
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|