JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS  1998

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: SVP

From:

"Roger Day" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Roger Day

Date:

Mon, 6 Jul 1998 10:36:11 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (148 lines)

My previous report about Lee Harwood and Ric Caddel at SVP has, I see,
received a mauling, and it seems as if it has been taken as an attack at
SVP in general. This particular report was not intended to be, and should
not be taken as, an attack on SVP. It was meant as a "pithy vignette" about
my visit to the event. Looking back at it, it ws probably too pithy and
thus left room for a broader interpretation than was meant to be taken. I
have no bone to pick with the series in general and would not want to
attack any courageous attempts to introduce innovative poets and poetry to
a wider audience. If the posting has a down-beat tone to it, it was
probably because I'd had my yearly appraisal at work that day. For any
perceived slight, I apologise.

As to any "analysis" and "personal dislikes and likes", I can only give you
what I felt about what I saw. If I did anything else, then I would be
dishonest, and doing myself, the event and those involved an injustice.

Roger

At 03/07/98 21:16:59, "Lawrence Upton." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
#  SVP, Sub Voicive Poetry, is an odd beast. It was common a few years back
to
#  attack it, especially if you didn't attend; but that seems to have
#  stopped... There's a lot wrong with SVP, which I separate from the
things
#  that could be done with it, but it survives. The venue is a bit of a
#  problem, but then so are all the venues I go to...
#
#  Because SVP has been going so long, nearly 20 years, it is or seems to
be an
#  institution; yet I believe it still runs largely counter to
#  institutionalisation, takes risks - if a series can take risks, and
provides
#  an outlet for poets who might otherwise not get an outlet - there are
more
#  of those than of those who are widely known.
#
#  I think that its strength is, in part, that it keeps going. The
complacency
#  with which it is treated does threaten its existence; worse, in my eyes,
is
#  what seems to be a tendency to second guess what one will like so that
it is
#  hard to introduce new poets to people... poets new to them that is...
#
#  SVP links us with n america and elsewhere. It ignores the cambridge v
london
#  thing. In so far as it can it brings poets from all over. The bias
towards
#  SE England is purely financial. SVP is international in its outlook
Always
#  has been
#
#  I have my preferences, enthusiasms and so on. I'll tell you now that I
am
#  hoping to get Colin Simms out of his hilly fastness in 99... On the
other
#  hand, I and those who help me go to some trouble to get a very wide
range of
#  poetries
#
#  Sometimes one gets weary of it - that happened the other night to some
#  extent when I found myself without an introduction - and I am looking
#  forward to the break. Not weary of it, but weary of the effort... By the
#  autumn I shall be missing it
#
#  For many years, there was only SVP. It is good that now we have One in
#  the Other - and the VI bill is often v interesting... It's
#  good to have variety of organisation and selection and venue and I wish
I
#  could get to more gigs
#
#  If you stay with it, SVP,  a wide range and quantity of poets pass
through.
#  I
#  remember it being like that at Earls Ct Sq before the airheads took
over;
#  and SVP has continued that, steadily. We owe Gilbert Adair a
#  lot. That he kept at it so long is a large part of its continued
survival.
#  It is inconceivable to me that we should easily let it be after all
those
#  years of hard and rewarded / rewarding work
#
#  It seems that the series is important to poets, many of whom are
extremely
#  generous in their response to svp, none of whom get anything out of it.
#
#  I like SVP to be relaxed and friendly. I like an anything goes approach.
At
#  the same time I believe that there is a *rigour to SVP. It can be a
tough
#  audience, when it turns up, sorry, but when it claps, you know it's
meant. I
#  would much rather have that concentrating silence that the mindless
response
#  to every perceived joke or right on statement that one gets in some
#  environments
#
#  The rigour is in the selection and planning too; and, I hope, in the
#  magazine. I hope to see the magazine expand which it certainly will if
#  audiences hold up and there is the cash to expand it. It will publish
#  reviews. It gives out selective information. The web pages will be
expanded
#  as useful information accrues. The free distribution of issues as part
of
#  the entrance guarantees a wide readership to the poets in the magazine
and I
#  would like to build on that...
#
#  I have sought in reviving the colloquium a different kind of rigour -
where
#  people talk rather than delivering papers, but where the talk is
informed
#  and open to ideas and not egocentric...
#
#  The only reason I introduce poets is that it is difficult to get others
to.
#  The only reason that I review the gigs is that it is difficult to get
others
#  to. We need involvement and exchange of informed views.
#
#  Analysis of readings *should pay attention to the appearance and
behaviour
#  of the poets. We should take account of their voices. But all analysis
#  should get beyond personal likes and dislikes. We need evidence. I would
#  rather people who had nothing to say kept quiet - advice I could listen
to
#  myself sometimes. So I'll stop now after one last comment - that if
poets
#  are willing to make the journey to SVP, having put in all the effort of
#  preparation, for so little material reward, the smallest return we can
give
#  them is to respond and exchange views on their output, for all our
benefit,
#  and the least restraint we can exercise is to avoid ignorant insults
#
#  and now I am going to bed in the hope I can get up in time to go to this
#  thingy tomorrow - ira why did you have to organ tomorrow of all days?
#
#  May the tears of Diana open your hearts
#
#  L




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager