Thanks to Jon, for putting a neck out. And to keston for presenting a
vorpal blade. Highly conventionalised views of the function of art
according to humanist Enlightenment terms of contestation about what might
constitute a 'fundamental nature'. . . whoa, there! Hang on Jon. Won't work
no more.
Prop up that feverish desire for consensus, come what may, the shack offers
little comfort - other than a simulacral roof to huddle under.
The curatorial tendency is a fascinating trope, requiring of AN originary
moment. Well, that's packaging for you! Let's toy with those linguistic
ribbons and bows a while. As Douglas says:
> Lots of my links are hanging loose.
or Keston:
> poetry . . . merely characterizes the reality of contents as
opportune [...]
'great' becomes socially dispersive (not quite, all that is solid melts
into air) as process, as in a conversation - no more freeze pops
writings and readings enter the weave of the endlessly particularisable everyday
- engagement and attention, the economies of value
reward? - breakfast
love and love
cris
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|