JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ALLSTAT Archives


ALLSTAT Archives

ALLSTAT Archives


allstat@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ALLSTAT Home

ALLSTAT Home

ALLSTAT  1998

ALLSTAT 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: TOPIC: MMR Vaccination

From:

(Ted Harding) <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 01:00:58 -0000 (GMT)

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

Am I alone in feeling somewhat unsatisfied by the official rebuttal of possible
risks associated with the combined Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccination, in the
news today?

The article that started it is by A J Wakefield et al. The Lancet vol 351 (9103)
1998, 637-641, and it may be located by searching on http://www.thelancet.com/

Its appearance led to a Committee being set up by the Chief Medical Officer of
Health whose conclusions were made public today.

The pathologies of interest are behavioural/neurological (autism; psychosis;
possible encephalitis; -> developmental regression) and intestinal, reported
for 12 children. The authors point out "association in time with possible
environmental triggers" and in discussion say "We have identified a chronic
enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction.
In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella
immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and
its possible relation to this vaccine."

They also say: "We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and
rubella vaccine and the syndrome described. Virological studies are underway
that may help to resolve this issue."

Regarding the asociation in time, the picture from their data is less clear
concerning the intestinal pathology than for the behavioural disorder, for
which the following table may be derived from their data (ages in months):

Age at MMR:    12    13    14    15    15    15    16    16    19    21

Age at onset:  12.25 13.5  14.1  15.25 15.25 16    18    18    19.25 21.05

leaving out 1 child for which onset followed 3 months after simple measles
vaccination at 15 months but dramatic behavioural deterioration immediately
followed MMR at 4.5 years; and 1 child with onset at 15 months with "previous
MMR" for which the "apparent precipitating event" was an attack of measles.

In the "Commentary" in the same issue of "The Lancet", by Robert T Chen and
Frank DeStefano, the time-association is addressed as follows: "A first dose of
MMR vaccine is given to about 600 000 children every year in the UK, most
during the second year of life, the time when autism first becomes manifest.
Not surprisingly, therefore, some cases will follow MMR vaccination."
Essentially the same reasoning was used in the 37-person Chief Medical Officer's
Committee rebuttal today.

Chen and DeStefano also say "Biased case-ascertainment, as in this study, will
exaggerate the association", which may be fair enough.

COMMENT: It is clear from the above table that, for these cases, given the
spread of Age at MMR there is an EXTREMELY strong statistical association with
Age at onset (even had cases been selected for onset following after MMR). This
nullifies the rebuttal "Not surprisingly ... " above.

The other major points from the Committee's statement are

1. "There is no evidence to indicate any link between MMR vacccination andbowel
disease or autism"

2. "There is a need for more research generally into the causes of Crohn's
disease, ulcerative colitis and autism".

COMMENT: It will be clear from a reading both of the Lancet paper and of the
Commentary, referred to above, that for this investigation there is plenty of
room for selection/ascertainment/recall/other bias, and for a good number of
covariates to play an explanatory role. This does not diminish the conclusion
that, statistically, it is clear that *something* is going on; but then the
question is: *What* is going on?

The official rebuttal, however, tends to suggest that *nothing* is going on,
and certainly fails to adduce any evidence that whatever it is that clearly *is*
going on is any particular alternative to the possibility that MMR vaccination
may precipitate the events reported. It does NOT acknowledge the strong
statistical association noted above.

Do I detect a vagueness reminiscent of the early days of BSE discussion?

Comments welcome. I have copied this to

[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]

should you feel that further discussion might be more appropriate elsewhere.

Best wishes to all,
Ted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 25-Mar-98                                       Time: 01:00:58
--------------------------------------------------------------------


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager