Wayne
Southampton Institute are in the process of revisiting anonymous marking -
your experiences would be greatly appreciated at a later stage.
Your question relating to the "'right' of students to opt-out of anonymous
marking scheme" is an interesting one which has not, to my knowledge arisen
before. As we do not presently run the scheme we have no practice in place
but would certainly be keen to hear other's views/experience.
Likewise - I would be interested to know what rules one would have to put
in place regarding "identification on the grounds of previous/ongoing
problems relating to academic impropriety".
Surely both issues are concerned with positive/negative discrimination?
Sorry this does not really help your situation.
Janet Bradford
Assistant Registrar (Awards)
Southampton Institute
(Embedded
image moved Wayne Turnbull <w.turnbull @ livjm.ac.uk>
to file: 08/06/98 16:59
pic30683.pcx)
Please respond to [log in to unmask]
To: admin-student @ mailbase.ac.uk
cc: (bcc: Jan Bradford/Registry/Southampton Institute)
Subject: Anonymous Marking
>
>>
>>Liverpool John Moores University are about to run a pilot project into
the implementation of anonoymous marking. The process will be informed by
the information generated by previous questions / discussions held on the
admin-mailbase on the subject of anonymous marking.
>>
>>I have two specific queries on this subject and would appreciate any help
/ comments that colleagues may have on the following:
>>1. The 'right' of students to opt-out of anonymous marking schemes (our
Equal Opps people are pushing for this, citing the need for identification
of some SwDs at the marking stage)
>>2. The issue of students who may require identification on the grounds
of previous / ongoing problems relating to academic impropriety
>>
>>Any advice on how these matters are dealt with elsewhere would be
appreciated.
>>
>>Wayne Turnbull
>>Academic Development Officer
>>LJMU
|