JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  1997

DIS-FORUM 1997

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

ADA and Exam Arrangements (fwd)

From:

"Celia L. Cockburn" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 27 Oct 1997 07:48:34 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (159 lines)

This may be of interest, and show aspects of the future under the DDA.

Celia

>Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 21:17:12 -0400 (EDT)
>From: pmaster <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Speak Softly . . . (fwd)
>X-List: [log in to unmask]
>X-Unsub: To leave, send text 'leave dyslexia' to [log in to unmask]
>Reply-To: pmaster <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 00:23:51 -0500 (CDT)
>From: 
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Speak Softly . . .
>
>. . . and carry a big crutch. See below.
>
>-
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>
>>DYSLEXIC WOULD-BE LAWYER SUES OVER BAR-EXAM TIMING
>>By TAMAR LEWIN
>>
>>  In the newest legal battleground over what assistance must be
>>given to learning-disabled students, a dyslexic 1996 law school
>>graduate has sued the California committee of bar examiners,
>>charging that its refusal to allow him double the normal time to
>>take the bar examination violated federal anti-discrimination laws.
>>
>>  The class-action lawsuit, filed by Robert Mueller on behalf of
>>all learning-disabled law graduates, said the state had illegally
>>thwarted his career by failing to accommodate his disability, which
>>makes him a slow reader.
>>
>>  Precisely what accommodations the federal law requires for those
>>with learning disabilities has been an increasingly contentious --
>>and litigious -- issue among educators and testers since 1992, when
>>the federal Americans with Disabilities Act went into effect. 
>>
>>  As the first wave of students determined to have learning
>>disabilities moves through graduate education, they are charting a
>>new frontier, demanding that accommodations like extra time, a
>>quiet room or use of a computer when they take professional
>>licensing exams in law, medicine or accounting: 
>>
>>  -- In June, in a West Virginia case against the National Board of
>>Medical Examiners, a federal district judge ruled against three
>>medical students with attention-deficit disorder who had sought
>>extra time and a separate testing room on their medical boards. 
>>
>>  -- In July, in a New York case now on appeal, a federal district
>>judge ruled that the state bar examiners had wrongly refused
>>accommodations to Marilyn Bartlett, a 1991 University of Vermont
>>law graduate who lost her law-firm job in 1992 after failing the
>>bar examination three times, and sued the state in 1993. The judge
>>ordered, among other things, that Ms. Bartlett get double time, use
>>of a word processor and the right to circle multiple-choice answers
>>on the question sheet, rather than fill out a separate answer
>>sheet. 
>>
>>  -- In August, in a closely watched case involving Boston
>>University, a federal judge ruled that although the university had
>>the right to set academic standards, its crackdown on
>>accommodations to learning-disabled students had been based on
>>uninformed stereotypes. The judge overturned the university's
>>policy of accepting diagnoses only from certain professionals and
>>ordered the university to reconsider whether its foreign-language
>>requirement was essential to its view of liberal arts education. 
>>
>>  The California bar examiners granted accommodations to 305
>>applicants taking the July examination this year, down from 335
>>last year -- but up from only 91 in 1990. While some of the
>>accommodations are for students with physical disabilities, the
>>majority are for those with learning disabilities or attention
>>deficit disorder. 
>>
>>  Lawrence Ashe Jr., the lawyer representing the state bar in the
>>lawsuit filed last month in U.S. District Court in Oakland, said he
>>believed the bar's handling of Mueller's request was proper -- and
>>he suggested that reading at a normal rate might well be a
>>legitimate qualification for becoming a lawyer. 
>>
>>  Increasingly, he said, the bar examiners are turning to outside
>>professionals for help in evaluating accommodation requests and are
>>developing new procedures for handling requests. 
>>
>>  Erica Moeser, president of the National Conference of Bar
>>Examiners, said: "Matching disabilities to the appropriate
>>accommodations is not an easy task, but I'd say most examiners do
>>their best to truly level the playing field for people with
>>disabilities. It has been a thicket, but my sense is that most
>>disabilities are accommodated, although perhaps not to the level
>>requested. Nationally, California has developed reputation for
>>being among the more generously accommodating of jurisdictions." 
>>
>>  Sid Wolinsky, the lawyer representing Mueller, said California's
>>reputation was well-deserved -- until late last year. 
>>
>>  "Up until the period leading to the February exam, we never
>>received a single complaint about the bar's failure to give
>>accommodations," said Wolinsky, a lawyer with Disability Rights
>>Advocates in Oakland, who also represented the students in the
>>Boston University case. 
>>
>>  "But at the end of 1996, we had a rash of complaints, all of them
>>from learning-disabled students who'd had accommodations in law
>>school, but were being denied for the February bar. Then we had
>>another set of complaints from people denied for the July exam.
>>I've gotten the distinct impression that they're singling out
>>learning disabilities, and cracking down." 
>>
>>  Mueller's case, he said, is typical of the recent denials. Now
>>44, he was found to have dyslexia in 1994. According to his
>>psychologist's 1994 evaluation, Mueller's reading rate is in the
>>bottom 3 percent of college seniors and his timed reading
>>comprehension is in the bottom 5 percent. Untimed, however, his
>>reading scores are in the high average to superior range. Mueller's
>>disability was not recognized when he was in elementary school, at
>>a time when much less was known about dyslexia. 
>>
>>  But after years as a photographer, Mueller became interested in
>>law and his diagnosis allowed him double time on the Law School
>>Admission Test. As a student at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he
>>got double time on all his examinations. In 1995, he took the
>>Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination with double time
>>-- a requirement for admission to the state bar -- and passed. 
>>
>>  But the California bar examiners, based on their own expert's
>>review of the documents he submitted, said Mueller could only have
>>time and a half for the examination. Mueller took the exam under
>>those conditions in February, and failed. He took it again in July,
>>but later asked that the examination not be graded.
>>
>>  Ashe was critical of that request. "I don't think that requesting
>>that your exam not be scored is consistent with someone who wants
>>to be admitted as soon as possible and is mitigating his losses,"
>>he said.
>>
>>Copyright 1997 The New York Times
>>
>
>
>
>
Welfare & Information Officer, King's College London, Macadam Bldng,
London WC2R 2LS Tel: 0171 873 2530   Fax: 0171 873 2754
Produced using voice activated software; apologies for uncorrected errors.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager