I have talked with a lot of people who have dug themselves into a hole
using this kind of logic. If this program is at all useful, there is
no telling what system it might be run on (or somebody might TRY to run
it on).
===
I've used a similar flag -nl# which allows the number of continued lines
to be greater than the standard (which is also 31 I believe), and it seems
to be quite portable, i.e. it works on NAG,IBM,Sun(?),SGI, this is portable
enough for me.
===
Surely 39 continuation lines is sufficient to do reasonable things and
31-character names are adequately descriptive. There is no reason to
use a name like "iwbcns". How about
isotherm_bound_cond_navier_stk
or something similar?
===
SUBROUTINE iwbcns()
instead of:
SUBROUTINE isothermal_wall_boundary_condition_navier_stokes
===
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|