i suppose the whole discussion could be about time and how you enjoy this
concept without where you are and if you then realise and say it well of
course it is somewhere you begin to wake to the flush from the wave front
fromage the wave break that if narrative is in time and of course it is
is it in context? and of course it is and thus what the hell you think
you're doing describing it as if it was always as it is when it cannot
but continually be various? in which case what's this about if it isn't
recognising the drastic crush of most notions of time and in particular
the stupid ideas of narrative as time based as if that said anything
sensible. well i don't buy that raga or that chant and what i wanted in
the narrativity matter was to say that cognition was implicitly a
narrative experience, unless you're saying that cognition has a fixed
truth about it that fixes it like disease or benign bacteria grabbing
nitrogen and well there's no variety of versions here but some version
and that means we all know what it means oh do we?
cognition just isn't very much agreed upon, how does that solve anything
about narrativity - it don't - it just don't always don't always mean the
same same again the same and that's the joy of it
kool-apples-ah!-4forme-5for you and love
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|