My case is that he jumped on the biomimicry bandwagon. The research was done in the mid 1990s. No birds were harmed in this study - or even observed. It’s greenwash.
> On 8 Jan 2019, at 18:18, Eileen Stephens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Julian,
> As I'm sure you know, the paper to which you refer is available in English (probably not same exact version as this was published in...2011? But I'm hoping close.) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0263-0923.30.1.1
>
> The paper talks about tunnel exits. With the kingfisher, the author was interested in tunnel entries. He is noted in endnote #9.
>
> Putting aside whether or not you buy the validity of the results of the analysis/efforts, the man believes he engaged in biomimicry in developing the design.
>
> Eileen
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the BIOMIMETICS list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=BIOMIMETICS&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the BIOMIMETICS list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=BIOMIMETICS&A=1
|