JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK  November 2018

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK November 2018

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [External] Records Disposal Procuedures

From:

Neil Gow <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:59:48 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

I would treat this as two separate issues.

1. Keeping a record of what you destroyed, where and when - required to provide evidence in the future that records were destroyed according to company policy and retention schedules, and not in some kind of Emron-like purge.

2. What level of authorisation (or independent quality check) is required to destroy the different classifications of documents, e.g. None, Management only, Management plus Quality Assurance (in my industry), or delegated to RM department (if that’s what you want).



If you always require some formal authorisation then the documentary evidence of these two can be easily combined - and even if it isn't you could still use a combined form and put "Not applicable" in the unused form fields (which is what we do). Our form requires:

- Description and location of records to be destroyed (sometimes they were generated by and have been stored with a third party contractor)

- Explanation/justification for destruction, with reference to the relevant retention schedule and/or external regulation if not explicitly captured in a retention schedule

- Name of person recommending destruction (almost always an archivist, business departments don't go round reviewing their archived or even locally filed records against the schedules)

- Up to two approvers (one or both may be N/A for certain record types)

- Date and method of destruction

- Destruction certificate or at least an email confirmation if records were at a third party

- Destruction reference number (useful to enter in the archive database, spreadsheets etc)

We have some flexibility. Sometimes if only an informal approval is required we keep an email in lieu of the form and annotate with the last three items.



With regard to defining when and what authorisation is required, this could be in a more detailed addendum to your records management policy so you can tailor it as appropriate for different record types, e.g. as one or more standard operating procedures or working instructions. Or you could maybe write it into the retention schedules.



By the way, all the above applies only to what we call "critical records", often called "essential records" elsewhere. These are the original records that must be kept for legal, regulatory or business (including intellectual property) purposes. All working copies, most drafts (except in a Litigation Hold situation), and anything not listed in the retention schedules (e.g. travel arrangements), are excluded as they fall into the category of things that should never be archived in the first place (along with unused stationery, textbooks, nameplates, business cards, a pair of shoes - and all the other crap that gets put in archive boxes!). No authorisation or record is required for destruction of such records and artefacts.



Neil.



-----Original Message-----

From: The Information and Records Management Society mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nia Thomas

Sent: 21 November 2018 15:26

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [External] Records Disposal Procuedures



Good afternoon



Would anyone care to share their disposal procedures please?  In particular relating to the process of verifying records to be disposed of.  Many years ago we gave up asking departments for authorisation to destroy their records that were past the retention date since they either didn't reply or wanted to keep them for longer without good cause.  We therefore take the Retention Schedules as authorisation, but not in all cases e.g. legal files, and rely on departments to inform us of any records subject to legal holds etc.  This system has worked efficiently without any problems but our Internal Audit Team have queried our procedures regarding authorisation and  regarding verification of the physical records to be destroyed i.e. someone double checking that the correct records are being destroyed.



I'm particularly concerned that if Audit's desire to expand the process is implemented it would be a nightmare to implement in the digital environment where retention periods are applied to document types in accordance with our Retention Schedules.



Many thanks

Nia



Cyngor Sir Gar

Carmarthenshire County Council



To view the list archives go to: https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/De2kxoVKB_Rhc4vD87KlILWd_54Q38dAO_covV4Vx_Y=?d=jeBIPcgd3uI91xo9tXQt7tevWs5J8MWOOoteViTNkduQWamlvHJY7utSDmTCCx3bN9Y4LRKyAI7ARAh8XSpROKCZ3T61y639QS6qQiWOVlwg1Q-zuPbEXwFbl74QVFFujrxLtoLZjJQ6pZYG71Y7VumDjjVqBFiDUop0Rk0M8pjohNNQwnGH9MKgpUzFVA_iXqBzbToFNoVTxSX7V_eKsc_10TSyRuwf2n5OOugItogXiFQWiWpbbcRN61rJ4wrvfE4ARSTURs0ULZ3LQGZasd1TY4Iv5-nL9ntL67Fe24uu6W2G6muehTZ4sEIW3sMZIrdTYBDrqnP7E-TQU5N7VmKH7mY9xZkvqG-dZ5jUqG-kXp-s-5scHU2pMj8DpCH9sTV7R6bTWHxw7cnlwIl6dR4tjJ5U7l3LEzSxMIH_Ws2eMA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FA0%3DRECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK



For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]

________________________________

UCB Celltech is the UK branch of UCB Pharma S.A., a company registered in Belgium with registered offices at Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070 Brussels, Belgium, KBO/BCE nr. 0403.096.168, RPR/RPM Brussels.

UCB Celltech’s UK branch registration number is BR009137 and its UK representative office is at 208 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire SL1 3WE.



(Ref: #*CUK0308) [Ref-CUK0308]

________________________________

Legal Notice: This electronic mail and its attachments are intended solely for the person(s) to whom they are addressed and contain information which is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure, except for the purpose for which they are intended. Dissemination, distribution, or reproduction by anyone other than the intended recipients is prohibited and may be illegal. If you are not an intended recipient, please immediately inform the sender and return the electronic mail and its attachments and destroy any copies which may be in your possession. UCB screens electronic mails for viruses but does not warrant that this electronic mail is free of any viruses. UCB accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this electronic mail. (Ref: #*UG1107) [Ref-UG1107]

________________________________



To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words UNSUBSCRIBE RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK



For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask]

For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager