What is the temporal and spatial resolution of this data and how many
minutes is it?
Peace,
Matt.
On 4/18/18, 11:11 AM, "FSL - FMRIB's Software Library on behalf of
Gianluca Mingoia" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>Dear Matt,
>I went for the first option. FIX successfully identifies all artifact
>related components: a lot; so many that noise-free components are very
>few and such low number does not permit me to identify the goal
>components in all subjects. I was considering to run melodic twice, a
>second time after FIX using the filtered_func_data_clean.nii.gz as input.
>Is it recommended to run Melodic twice?
>
>Best,
>Gianluca.
>
>
>
>It is helpful if you include the previous responses in your reply for
>context. You can use sICA+FIX (best for HCP-Style acquisitions and
>analysis) or ICA-AROMA (legacy acquisitions and analysis) for
>classification of artifactual sICA components.
>
>Peace,
>
>Matt.
>
>On 4/18/18, 10:04 AM, "FSL - FMRIB's Software Library on behalf of
>Gianluca Mingoia" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
>>Thank you for your answer!
>>I am not sure, actually I think there is something wrong in the DICOMs. I
>>have run SPM12_aqua for quality assessment; all outputs (PSC, movements,
>>qq-plot, mean image) are fine. I hypothesize that could be a spin history
>>or transient gradient artifact; I was wonder if some of you have more
>>expertise with such artifacts and give me some ideas to classify an
>>ideally correct it.
>>Best,
>>Gianluca.
|