Thanks Jeffrey. Appreciated. Cheers.
------------------Original Message-------------------
Jeffrey Side wrote:
David, I’ve been avoiding this discussion in case it resulted in too much of a heated argument. But the discussion has, so far, been generally courteous. What you have said tallies with what I think and have written about in the past; though you have articulated it far more eloquently and forthrightly.
I’m pleased that The Argotist Online feature about this topic has prompted at least this discussion here. I had originally hoped it would have caused more of an online impact, but from what Tim has said I can see why it hasn’t.
In the spirit of friendship, I invite those of you here who agree with the Argotist feature but are too wary of making yourselves known here, to contact me privately to express your views. I genuinely want to hear what other (unrevealed) supporters of the Argotist feature think. It would be good to get the views of some women supporters. The feature was originally criticised because of the predominance of male participants. I did try to get some female ones, but the ones I approached refused to take part.
|