Dear SPM experts,
spm_mask is throwing a warning "'ImCalc should be preferred to spm_mask whenever possible."
* I would like to know why ImCalc should be preferred ?
* Moreover, when I try to use ImCalc to mask an image, I am facing two issues :
- some of the datatypes are not supported by ImCalc but are supported by spm_mask (e.g. uint16)
- more important, if I am not mistaken, 4D images are not supported by ImCalc but are handled nicely by spm_mask
Is there a way around ?
thanks for your help,
Pierre
|