I’m not sure where in the process xjview is going wrong, but the smoothness estimates at the bottom of the table are wildly different from what SPM calculates, which is what’s leading to your different cluster level values.
--
Mike Angstadt
Research Area Specialist Lead / PANLab Lab Manager
Department of Psychiatry / University of Michigan
(734) 936-8229
From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ramesh Babu
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 1:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [SPM] Interpretation of SPM12 and xjview output
Dear Experts,
I need your help to interpret the result, because I am getting two different outputs.
Please see the attached file for output from xjview and spm12, marked with pen. In xjview cluster level corrected and uncorrected p value are 0.000. But in SPM12 output I didn't cluster level corrected p values as mentioned in xjview.
Thanks in advance.
RB
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
|