Dear Guillaume,
Thanks for your answer. Indeed it shouldn't change. I was confused there
for a bit.
Regards,
Glad
On 10/13/2017 02:07 PM, Guillaume Flandin wrote:
> Dear Glad,
>
> I don't see why the interpretation would change here but you are
> probably the person who used 2nd level Bayes the most so you're a better
> expert than me here!
>
> Best regards,
> Guillaume.
>
>
> On 11/10/17 09:36, Paul Glad Mihai wrote:
>> Dear SPM experts,
>>
>> If I have a 2nd Level Model which takes the contrasts from the first
>> level across subjects in the first column and then I use a covariate for
>> each subject in the second column, looking at the second column contrast
>> I see the correlation of the parameter estimates with the covariate
>> using frequentist inference. If I then estimate this model again using
>> Bayesian estimation, does the meaning stay the same, i.e. correlation of
>> covariate with parameter estimates?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Glad
>
--
Paul Glad Mihai, PhD
Independent Research Group "Neural Mechanisms of Human Communication"
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Stephanstraße 1A, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 341-9940-2478
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
|