Bravo, for doubling down on the faux radicalism. It is always great to see privileged folks assert such things when they've not suffered the manifestations of what they argue as an "academic exercise". Perhaps some people seek to position themselves to benefit when an argument emerges for recolonisation (to block refugees, to gain scarce resources and to resume the White man's burden to revive white man's relevance).
Bravo indeed.
Sent from my iPad
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 12:40 pm, Willis N. Churnocht <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> What could be more critical and radical than putting forward an argument defending colonialism?
>
> Bravo to this chap for breaking the mold and being brave enough to raise some important questions.
|