JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for TB-SUPPORT Archives


TB-SUPPORT Archives

TB-SUPPORT Archives


TB-SUPPORT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TB-SUPPORT Home

TB-SUPPORT Home

TB-SUPPORT  July 2017

TB-SUPPORT July 2017

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

On the subject of alternative subject alternative names in (host) certificates

From:

"Jensen, Jens (STFC,RAL,SC)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:19:18 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (93 lines)

Hi,

Apologies in advance for a slightly long and unslightly technical email.
It is not that complicated once you get used to it.

1. If you attended hepsysman you would have seen my presentation [1] on
subject alternative names for host certificates (ie aliases, typically),
sometimes needed to comply with Globus (finally) honouring the
requirements of RFC 2818 [2] section 3.1.

We now have better support for this in the UK e-Science CA. It's not
perfect - none of the CA stuff is - but it works (probably).

2. The desired alternative names are submitted with the request.

RA operators still have to approve the request.  However, since the RA
ops currently have poor visibility of the extra added additional
additions, you have to be pre-authorised to request extra SANs (if you
just want the single hostname, that in the CN, you do NOT need
pre-authorisation, it is the old process). This means that for anyone
requesting an alternative name, beyond the single hostname in the CN,
your permission is granted to your personal DN to request a FQDN or to a
domain as an alternative name.  Permissions are granted separately to
wildcard names.

E.g. Joe Bloggs with DN /C=UK/O=eScience/OU=uni/L=phys/CN=joe bloggs
requests a host certificate for foobar123.phys.uni.ac.uk, and wishes to
obtain an alternative name. If he has permission for www.gridpp.ac.uk
then he can get only that name; if the permission is to .gridpp.ac.uk,
Joe can get www.gridpp.ac.uk and planet.gridpp.ac.uk as alternative
names, etc. Separately Joe may have permissions for wildcards for
phys.uni.ac.uk, meaning he can get *.cloud.phys.uni.ac.uk but not
*.uni.ac.uk (which would not be a good idea.)

Wildcards currently have to be the first character, see [5], section
3.4.8. So *.cloud.phys.uni.ac.uk, not host*.cloud.phys.uni.ac.uk, much
less host.*.phys.uni.ac.uk or host*.*.uni.ac.uk.

3. How do you get authorisation? Since your RA operator needs to approve
your host requests, they should requests permission on your behalf
BEFORE your request is submitted (or at least before it is signed); by
sending an ideally signed (with their certificate) email with the
request to the helpdesk. Currently myself and Suleman can add
permissions to the system; once added, they stay on the system until
they are revoked.

Note also that permissions are granted to the /group/ of alternative
names /together/; so our friend Joe may have a group for the cloud hosts
and a group for the web hosts, but cannot mix the two; if he tries, it
will be denied. It is permissible to request a proper subset of the group.

However, you might say the group permission needs to exclude the CN;
otherwise you would need a permissions line for each one of your CNAMEs,
such as foobar123.phys.uni.ac.uk. In that case, the link between the CN
and the alternative names is broken. Instead, I would add the domain for
the CNAMES (such as .phys.uni.ac.uk) to the permissions set, so it
covers all of Joe's CNAMEs on a single line.

4. Unfortunately checking is currently only done by the signing system
(which is the ultimate authority for signing stuff); not by the
servers.  So if your request is rejected, it does not sign. It would be
nice if you had prior warning (at submission time), or maybe an error
mail in the worst case; that would be the next step. (There is an
interesting amusing bug in CW which also should be fixed.)

5. Please note that this DOES NOT work for renewals. When the time for
renewal rolls around, it is RECOMMENDED you request a new certificate
(part of the reason is that the permission needs re-checking, and at
renewal time, the CA only sees the host certificate DN, not the owner's DN.)

6. Thanks to the following people:

  * Robert Frank, for very quickly updating the PeCR to support this stuff.
  * John Kewley for testing it on the dev CA
  * This was one of the many things [6] I worked on during the WLCG
    workshop, so thanks to Dave Kelsey.
  * Bruno Canning from T1 for being our first live volunteer.

I will join dteam today so I can explain, if you are confused...

Thanks
--jens

7. References

[1]
https://indico.cern.ch/event/592622/contributions/2582452/attachments/1476271/2286995/identity.pdf
[2] http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt
[3] https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/SubjectAltName
[4] http://www.ngs.ac.uk/ukca/pecr.html
[5] http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.225.pdf
[6] http://storage.esc.rl.ac.uk/weekly/20170628-minutes.txt

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager