I sent the following response to these questions from David (which I have only just noticed).
1. A number of examples scattered throughout blogs quoting FAIR http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?s=FAIR+
2. http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=18344 which I regard as the most relevant to the last question
3. http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=18365 which discusses the curation of a 9-year-old FAIR data table published as part of a journal article so that it remains FAIR currently and into the future.
Post 2 in particular provides our interpretation of guidelines for chemists specifically, which target DataCite metadata. We believe each subject domain must develop or at least explore such guidelines, I doubt anything generic will do the job.
> On 26 May 2017, at 22:56, David Hartland <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Dear colleague,
> Jisc (www.jisc.ac.uk) is conducting research into the meaning and (potential) impact of
> the FAIR data principles in practice. We would be very grateful if you would reply by email to
> the following brief questions to begin to help us understand the landscape.
>
> - What is your role?
> - Have you heard of FAIR data principles?
> - Are you applying any of these principles?
> - Does your research group or institution have any guidance on how to implement FAIR?
>
> Regards,
> Dr Robert Allen and David Hartland
> Jisc FAIR in practice project - part of Jisc’s Research at Risk work that supports the sector on
> reproducibility of research and on improving practice and impact of Research Data Management.
|