Hello all,
Thanks to everyone who has already completed the table for this year's
GOCDB review[1][2].
At last check 7 sites had yet to complete their row in the table - if
you could do so soon that would be great. From Tuesday we'll have to
start nagging if sites who haven't I'm afraid! No want wants me nagging
them.
Hope everyone has a Grand Weekend!
Matt
[1] https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/2017_GOCDB_REVIEW
[2] https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=127588
On 26/04/17 11:47, Matt Doidge wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> As mentioned in yesterday's Ops meeting, there is a new yearly drive to
> check the information in the gocdb - which is good to know seeing as the
> gocdb is likely becoming the de facto place to get resource information
> from.
>
> The UK has a ticket about this, which you can feel free to put your
> tuppence worth into:
> https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=127588
>
> But to make life easier we conjured up one of the wiki tables you all
> love filling in to provide a summary of each site's "review status":
>
> https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/2017_GOCDB_REVIEW
>
> To keep it easy there's only 3 columns to fill in, and two of those can
> be filled with an affirmative, the other is optional. The things to
> check are the contact details for the site (people, email and telephone
> numbers) and the endpoint information for the site resources (CEs and
> whatnot). As Jeremy mentioned there is likely a good amount of stale
> contact information from people who have left gridpp still being
> registered at sites. Their contributions might live on with us, but
> their gocdb roles shouldn't. Similarly with that CE you might have run 5
> years ago but never deleted from the gocdb. Let it go.
>
> To be clear, in this instance the verb "check" means "to look at and fix
> any errors", rather then just look!
>
> If sites could look at this as soon as possible that would be great - we
> will likely review this in Tuesday's Ops meeting. As always feel free to
> chime in with any questions if anything is unclear.
>
> Thanks in advance all!
> Matt
|