David
The normal process of linking land use and potential contaminants would apply. So certainly the desk study and walkover for the sorts of sites you list ought to flag up the possibility.
The awareness of "emerging" contaminants and specifically of PFOS, PFOA and related has grown over the past couple of years with the lessons from Buncefield, the Concawe report, various presentations at workshops, an entire conference and dare I mention it my own webinar as part of the Brownfield Briefing/ LQM webinar series last year.
We are looking at which substances to include in the next iteration of LQM/CIEH GAC and certainly PFOS & PFOA are high on the list of substances to add to the present inventory!
Hope that helps,
Paul
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the EE network.
Original Message
From: David E Jackson
Sent: miércoles, 22 de marzo de 2017 12:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: David E Jackson
Subject: Re: CRC CARE guidance on PFOS and PFOA published
Paul,
Is this something we should be routinely checking for at airports, ex-MoD, fire training ground and fire stations, significant industrial complexes with their own fire-fighting facilities etc? Will S4UL project provide UK equivalent screening levels?
Cheers David E Jackson
|