JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  January 2017

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING January 2017

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: CRUMB discussion: Methods for studying the (after)lives of Internet art

From:

karin de wild <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

karin de wild <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 1 Jan 2017 17:26:16 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (164 lines)

On behalf of Marleen Stikker (director Waag Society, Amsterdam):

Dear all,

Just to fill you in on the Amsterdam/Waag side of the Brandon project. We
are working on our Waag archive and Brandon is an excellent project to dig
deep in code, web and our attic. We found several pieces and props of the
installations. Here some first findings
http://project.waag.org/brandon/index.php3

The curator and artistic team @waag consisted of:
Mieke Gerritzen
Janine Huizenga
Caroline Nevejan
Susanne Oxenaar
Joep van Lieshout (theatrum circles)
Marleen stikker (jury app)
There were more people involved. Have to check.

My impressions was that Waag understood Brandon better than the Guggenheim
Museum at that time. The museum struggled with the hybrid nature of the
work and could not provide the technical, conceptual and financial support.
Waag supported Brandon over a period of two years from 1997 till 1999.
There has been a substantial financial support from Waag Society and from
the Dutch Mondriaan Fund. Waag could contribute some sophisticated artistic
coding (jury app) and top notch performative design from some great Dutch
artist. It could be interesting to explore this and see how it was embedded
in the artistic practice of Waag and its place in the early days of netart.
It also tells a story about the pyramid art world with musea at the top and
artist trying to make them understand new artistic practices. And at the
same time new artistic platforms and institutions where building up that
where not officially recognised by the formal art world. Not much have
changed over the years :)

Looking forward collaborating on this research in the coming new year!

Best wishes,
Marleen

_____________________________________________


From our website:
http://waag.org/en/project/brandon
<http://waag.org/en/project/brandon>
Brandon - Waag Society <http://waag.org/en/project/brandon>
waag.org
Brandon is a documentary story about (sexual) identity, initiated by the
internationally acclaimed media artist Shu Lea Cheang, and made accessible
through the ...


Brandon is a documentary story about (sexual) identity, initiated by the
internationally acclaimed media artist Shu Lea Cheang, and made accessible
through the Internet in 1998-1999. The project researched issues of sexual
politics through a series of hyperlinked experimental narratives and
discourses. The events were staged at the Theatrum Anatomicum in The Waag,
Amsterdam.

In co-production with the Guggenheim Museum New York, two events were
staged as part of the project: 'DIGI GENDER SOCIAL BODY: Under the knife,
Under the spell of anaesthesia', a performance and installation, and 'Would
the jurors please stand up? Crime and punishment as Net Spectacle', a
netcast roundtable. Both events were broadcasted on the video wall of the
Guggenheim Museum and presented on the World Wide Web.

In the course of the year two public events were organized which were a
combination of forum, performance and installation. These events took place
in the Theatrum Anatomicum of the Waag in Amsterdam whilst simultaneously
being broadcast on the internet and shown on the Videowall of the
Guggenheim Museum in New York. Brandon was shown on an unusual scale for
web projects in these days: three interactive displays of 25 screens each.

The Waag's Theatrum Anatomicum was of major importance to the Brandon
project. This is where in the 17th century, the guild of surgeons publicly
taught human anatomy by dissecting the corpses of criminals. This practice
was the inspiration behind Rembrandt's painting 'The Anatomical Lesson of
Dr. Tulp'. Brandon can be seen as a contemporary version of these
dissections.


2016-11-29 17:08 GMT+00:00 Shu Lea Cheang <[log in to unmask]>:

First all, I thank Karin for organizing this discussion and gathering
> you/we all.
>
> Interestingly i am aware that i am the only [net] artist invited? with
> connections to many of you curators on this list.
>
> Let me flash my memories, naviagate through my own (after)lives -
>
> John G. Hanhardt was chief curator who commissioned 'Brandon' while still
> at the Whitney museum. Brandon (1998-1999)
> was brought to the Guggenheim Museum Soho as John relocated. This was the
> time that Guggenheim was planning the virtual museum (Hani Rashid /
> Asymptote). Matthew Drutt, then the associate curator for film and media
> took over the realization of the project who "views Brandon as the
> foundation for
> the next Guggenheim, the cyber equivalent of Bilbao". (Village Voice,
> 1998). The major partner for Brandon is Waag Society (then Society for old
> and new media) in Amsterdam. Marleen Stikker who remains the director of
> Waag supported the project wholeheartedly. Brandon's two major interface
> Theatrum Anatomicum and Panopticon was developed and produced at Waag
> Society over a year's time with many designers, programmers involved, with
> year long residency supported by Amsterdams Fonds voor de Kunst.  In Waag
> Society, there remains Theatrum Anatomicum (built in 1691) where
> Rembrandt's The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp guided the building of
> this amphitheater for anatomical lessons. A trip to Arnhem Koepel Prison
> which was built according to Panopticon Principle and remained functional
> helped created the panopticon interface. Way before streaming media, the
> opening of Brandon at the Guggenheim museum Soho was beamed from Theatrum
> Anatomicum with still images shuffling between New York and Amsterdam.
>
> But then before Brandon, there was Bowling Alley (1995, commissioned by
> Walker Art Center), a net based installation that connected an actual
> Minneapolis bowling lane with Walker Art Center's gallery and WWW. There
> was at the end some issues with the museum who asked for filtering/editing
> certain online/live texts input.  The work was mostly 'kicked' out of the
> museum. I have only Steve Dietz to thank for taking in the website to the
> gallery 9. I should also mention how later Steve and Sarah Cook as
> curators  included Brandon at the exhibition "The Art Formerly Know As New
> Media" (2005) held at the Banff Center (part of its 10th anniversary
> exhibiition) where I started HTML coding for Brandon back in 1997.
>
> I then need to thank Michael Connor who was courageous to show Kingdom of
> Piracy (an online curatorial project with  Armin Medosch and Yukoko
> Shikata) to open FACT's then brand new media lounge in 2003 right after its
> Ars Electronica run in 2002 and after it's being terminated by ADAC (Acer
> Digital Art Center) who first commissioned it in 2001. KOP [Kingdon of
> Piracy] website/workspace, however, is somehow lost now somewhere in
> Germany. (it hurts).
>
> (sorry, feel like i am retrieving personal history, but hope somehow these
> notes would help me get to some points)
>
> Still, I was part of ARTPORT platform initiated and curated by Christiane
> Paul.
> But then, another commission from Annet Dekker to compost skor.nl archive
> as part of my composting the net (2013) project [
> http://compostingthenet.net]
> also disappeared when Skor (foundation for art and publis space) was shut
> due to Dutch budget cut in recent years.
>
> So, good to meet all of these people I respect and love dearly here.
>
> I do question Dr. Matthias Kampmann's arguement for "centralised world
> wide data base, working in a way of standardised critiria" after reading
> his own painstaking preservation works on certain art works.  if we can
> agree with Hanhardt's "being in a museum should not normalize the artwork",
> can we possible devise 'centrailized' 'standardised" methods on
> preservation?
>
> Much thanks to Hanhardt for bringing up Brandon... to tell the
> preservation of Brandon would take another posting. Indeed, Brandon lives
> (not after).
>
>
> best
> sl
>
>
> About the Theatrum Anatomicum of the Waag in Amsterdam
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager