On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, sjones wrote:
> On 2016-10-21 17:28, Marcus Ebert wrote:
>> Keeping this in mind, I think one could put the information about all
>> approved VOs in a single rpm. That way at least this part of the
>> information needed to support a VO would be on all sites already.
>> In the meantime, it wouldn't hurt a site which doesn't fully support a
>> specific the VO to have the text files from the rpm on disk.
> The effect of releasing a metapackage that calls for all the individual RPMs
> (as proposed by David) amounts to much the same thing, I think.
> I'll follow this up soon and release a metapackage - my mind is no longer in
> the 'blown' state, and I can see certain advantages to this, mostly related
> to simplicity. Es ist immer noch eine Schrotflinte-Lösung, aber manchmal ist
> das das Beste.
Yes, David's proposal of a metapackage is the cleaner and better solution
of it, although a bit more work and still allows sites to have only part
of the supported VOs information installed. But yes, it's the better
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.