the accounting TF has now a dashboard to compare results from the
experiments accounting records with the APEL results.
This contains all the experiments latest values which are updated each
month with the numbers of the previous finished month.
There is also an historical view these are the UK sites from January
Most UK sites are ok, there are however 3 problematic sites which have
RED more often than not UCL, RHUL and ECDF. Brunel was red in August
and September too.
If you click on each month there is a json file with the numbers for the
month contained in the Status field the elements of the array of numbers
are: HS06 on the atlas dashboard, HS06 in APEL, ratio, wallclock in
ATLAS, wallclock in APEL, wallclock ratio. For example ECDF in August
APEL HS06 value 55882 is 45% the ATLAS dashb value 123600
The APEL wallclock 4299 is 37% of the ATLAS dashb value 11771
Sometimes the discrepancies are the other way, i.e. APEL much bigger
than ATLAS. ATLAS gets the numbers only for the payload, while APEL gets
the numbers from the batch system including all the pilot time, so in
theory APEL should always be slightly bigger. Whatever the numbers they
should be within 15-20% difference once way or the other.
I've put these pages in the links page
Let me know if you have any comment. Can UCL, RHUL, ECDF and Brunel help
me understand their discrepancies please?
Respect is a rational process. \\//
Fatti non foste a viver come bruti (Dante)