JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS  October 2016

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS October 2016

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: a bit much

From:

David Lace <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

British & Irish poets <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:44:23 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (32 lines)

I’m flattered you have searched the list's archives to find criticism of me. If I remember correctly, Geraldine took issue with me after I said she was being unreasonable for expecting notices she posted here advertising new books by her to be commented on favourably or not at all. This struck me as being a bit egotistical, hence my criticism of her, to which your quote from her is her response. 

Apart from that incident, I don’t think you have found any other ones where I have been critical of people here. I accept I’m being critical with you, now, but only for your switching position regarding Mark’s statement—one minute you ridicule it by saying it was only a joke, then the next you say he is obviously right and you thought so all along. Several days were spent with you arguing that his statement was not important to the debate, and then when you “saw the light” you changed your mind, saying that it wasn’t a change of mind at all but an unstated agreement with it all along.

It is this example of dishonest arguing that I am criticising you for, and not because we disagree about songs and poetry being the same or not.

And yes, those people who emailed me were real. And for obvious reasons I can’t mention them. And yes, according to one of them you did make a plea to the list a few years ago to cry foul and throw your toys out of the pram when you were losing an argument. I will now attempt to locate it in the archives, if only to settle the matter. 

You can if you wish continue to make subtle remarks that suggest I should be banned from this list. That is you right. But to do so on the grounds you cite would be improper.





-------------Original Message----------------


Jamie McKendrick wrote:

Of the ten or so entirely personalised and sarcastic posts David Lace has directed at me, I see little to be gained by replying as no serious argument is advanced in them. In this one, however, he mentions an issue that is of concern to me.
 
About the first remark I'll merely repeat that I found Mark's comment humorous. I have no sure idea what Mark's intent was, though I do suspect it was intended as I took it. It's only David who presumes that, as he says "I take him at his word, as that is all his statement allows for." On a poetry discussion list it seems ironic that someone should claim any statement can only be read in one way, and that all other interpretations are to be disallowed. If anything is presumptuous – and megalomaniacal – it’s this. Since I keep getting accused of changing my position about this I can only repeat I’ve neither   denied the truth of Mark’s comment nor (for that matter) affirmed it – I don’t even think it requires that of anyone. It’s only David who seems to be treating it as holy writ so I leave him to his rapt contemplation of it.
 
But the second paragraph raises an issue I care about. The portrayal of my behaviour (“you like to play the victim on this list...Most of the debates involving you in the past have resulted in you calling ‘foul’...”) is evidently untrue, and there are no examples given to help establish why David thinks this or what purpose apart from vilification saying it would serve.
   David refers to a “few people who have emailed” him in agreement and seems to suggest they have to keep their communications sub rosa because, unlike him, being poets they have something to lose by opposing me openly. What would that be? I have no administrative, executive, editorial, or advisory power in the poetry world. I rarely even review. I am a freelance writer and translator and do a small amount of teaching here and there. It’s not well paid work but I chose it and like it, and have never considered myself a victim in that respect nor in relation to this list. I see my position as relatively privileged. So those furtive back-channelers should feel emboldened to speak out.
   But the main point of my replying is this. Whether or not these are real people or imaginary friends of David (I have no way way of knowing unless they make their arguments themselves) I have indeed quarrelled with the way this list permits any kind of rudeness and attack in contravention to the list rules. And this has, in the last however many years, only once (or twice?) been on my own behalf. It has nearly always been with regard to some ‘ad hominem’ insult to someone absent from the list. I think there really is a moral principle here and I know I have been openly disagreed with on this by many people here. Regardless of the emails sent to David I think my stance on this deserves consideration and at least a modicum of respect. In the past on those occasions  when things became abusive, the list managers have intervened, but for some years the present incumbents, whoever they are, have been in a state of oblivious hibernation, and I believe that means the list has suffered several times because of that.
    When I saw David’s posts were obsessively focusing on trying to attack me personally and saw how it was only going to deteriorate, I suggested some ground rules for the continuing discussion, but the suggestions were immediately repudiated by him. The result has been a completely unnecessary obstruction to reasonable discourse, surely what we want from a discussion group. As David has referred to my behaviour on the list without any example to justify his view, I feel entitled to remind him of another of his malicious outbursts which was directed at Geraldine Monk who’s no longer, I think, on the list. After misconstruing an ironic remark of hers, David began a similar campaign of jeers and taunts, which received the exasperated, though, it has to be said, not entirely polite response from her of  “As for David Lace’s reply – he’s likes to insult people and his response is so beneath contempt I can’t even be arsed to tell him to go fuck himself.  So I won’t bother.”
    To avoid the need for this kind of response, but more than that, to avoid the frustration that leads to it, I would renew, without any hope of its happening, my call for us to respect the spirit if not the letter of the list’s rules. While the list is mostly and happily self-regulating, even when the exchange becomes heated, it only takes one episode of trolling behaviour to wreck the possibility of any discussion.
   Sorry for the length of this,
Jamie
 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager